The Voice Behind the Words: Quantifying Intersectional Bias in SpeechLLMs

Speech Large Language Models (SpeechLLMs) process spoken input directly, retaining cues such as accent and perceived gender that were previously removed in cascaded pipelines. This introduces speaker identity dependent variation in responses. We present a large-scale intersectional evaluation of accent and gender bias in three SpeechLLMs using 2,880 controlled interactions across six English accents and two gender presentations, keeping linguistic content constant through voice cloning. Using pointwise LLM-judge ratings, pairwise comparisons, and Best-Worst Scaling with human validation, we detect consistent disparities. Eastern European-accented speech receives lower helpfulness scores, particularly for female-presenting voices. The bias is implicit: responses remain polite but differ in helpfulness. While LLM judges capture the directional trend of these biases, human evaluators exhibit significantly higher sensitivity, uncovering sharper intersectional disparities.

What Counts as Real? Speech Restoration and Voice Quality Conversion Pose New Challenges to Deepfake Detection

Audio anti-spoofing systems are typically formulated as binary classifiers distinguishing bona fide from spoofed speech. This assumption fails under layered generative processing, where benign transformations introduce distributional shifts that are misclassified as spoofing. We show that phonation-modifying voice conversion and speech restoration are treated as out-of-distribution despite preserving speaker authenticity. Using a multi-class setup separating bona fide, converted, spoofed, and converted-spoofed speech, we analyse model behaviour through self-supervised learning (SSL) embeddings and acoustic correlates. The benign transformations induce a drift in the SSL space, compressing bona fide and spoofed speech and reducing classifier separability. Reformulating anti-spoofing as a multi-class problem improves robustness to benign shifts while preserving spoof detection, suggesting binary systems model the distribution of raw speech rather than authenticity itself.

Speak Your Mind: The Speech Continuation Task as a Probe of Voice-Based Model Bias

Speech Continuation (SC) is the task of generating a coherent extension of a spoken prompt while preserving both semantic context and speaker identity. Because SC is constrained to a single audio stream, it offers a more direct setting for probing biases in speech foundation models than dialogue does. In this work we present the first systematic evaluation of bias in SC, investigating how gender and phonation type (breathy, creaky, end-creak) affect continuation behaviour. We evaluate three recent models: SpiritLM (base and expressive), VAE-GSLM, and SpeechGPT across speaker similarity, voice quality preservation, and text-based bias metrics. Results show that while both speaker similarity and coherence remain a challenge, textual evaluations reveal significant model and gender interactions: once coherence is sufficiently high (for VAE-GSLM), gender effects emerge on text-metrics such as agency and sentence polarity. In addition, continuations revert toward modal phonation more strongly for female prompts than for male ones, revealing a systematic voice-quality bias. These findings highlight SC as a controlled probe of socially relevant representational biases in speech foundation models, and suggest that it will become an increasingly informative diagnostic as continuation quality improves.