IMB-NAS: Neural Architecture Search for Imbalanced Datasets

Class imbalance is a ubiquitous phenomenon occurring in real world data distributions. To overcome its detrimental effect on training accurate classifiers, existing work follows three major directions: class re-balancing, information transfer, and representation learning. In this paper, we propose a new and complementary direction for improving performance on long tailed datasets - optimizing the backbone architecture through neural architecture search (NAS). We find that an architecture's accuracy obtained on a balanced dataset is not indicative of good performance on imbalanced ones. This poses the need for a full NAS run on long tailed datasets which can quickly become prohibitively compute intensive. To alleviate this compute burden, we aim to efficiently adapt a NAS super-network from a balanced source dataset to an imbalanced target one. Among several adaptation strategies, we find that the most effective one is to retrain the linear classification head with reweighted loss, while freezing the backbone NAS super-network trained on a balanced source dataset. We perform extensive experiments on multiple datasets and provide concrete insights to optimize architectures for long tailed datasets.

Accurate Anchor Free Tracking

Visual object tracking is an important application of computer vision. Recently, Siamese based trackers have achieved good accuracy. However, most of Siamese based trackers are not efficient, as they exhaustively search potential object locations to define anchors and then classify each anchor (i.e., a bounding box). This paper develops the first Anchor Free Siamese Network (AFSN). Specifically, a target object is defined by a bounding box center, tracking offset, and object size. All three are regressed by Siamese network with no additional classification or regional proposal, and performed once for each frame. We also tune the stride and receptive field for Siamese network, and further perform ablation experiments to quantitatively illustrate the effectiveness of our AFSN. We evaluate AFSN using five most commonly used benchmarks and compare to the best anchor-based trackers with source codes available for each benchmark. AFSN is 3-425 times faster than these best anchor based trackers. AFSN is also 5.97% to 12.4% more accurate in terms of all metrics for benchmark sets OTB2015, VOT2015, VOT2016, VOT2018 and TrackingNet, except that SiamRPN++ is 4% better than AFSN in terms of Expected Average Overlap (EAO) on VOT2018 (but SiamRPN++ is 3.9 times slower).