On the Evaluation of Spiking Neural Network Configurations for Network Intrusion Detection

Network intrusion detection is a core component of modern cybersecurity infrastructure, yet the deep learning models that dominate the field are computationally demanding, motivating interest in lightweight alternatives suited to edge and neuromorphic deployment. Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) are therefore a natural candidate, but their design space, spanning the choice of neuron model and spike encoding scheme, remains poorly characterized for intrusion detection. We bridge this gap by using a controlled ablation study using 9 neurons coupled with 3 spike encoding schemes, making 27 variants, all implemented on snntorch evaluated over raw inputs with limited preprocessing on four benchmark datasets (NSL KDD, KDDCup99, CIC-IDS2017, and CTU-13) with 5 seeds. We find that spike encoding scheme is a better determinant for detection quality than the neuron model, where rate and delta spike encodings perform worse than latency encoding over the sweep. The LeakyParallel neuron with latency encoding performed the best overall, averaging at 92.11% accuracy and 0.80 macro- F1 at a rate of 2.01% false positives averaged over all 4 datasets, with accuracy close to perfect for CIC-IDS2017 and CTU-13, and also performed the fastest on inference. These results highlight the potential of SNNs as a viable alternative to traditional methods of intrusion detection when considering low-latency or resource-constrained deployments.

Do We Really Need Quantum Machine Learning?: A Multidimensional Empirical Study

The rapid growth of computer vision and increasingly complex image recognition tasks has exposed fundamental computational limitations of classical machine learning models, motivating the exploration of quantum computing as an emerging new paradigm. This paper presents a comprehensive benchmarking study of classical and quantum machine learning models for image recognition on the MNIST handwritten digit dataset, evaluating both traditional models, a Classical Support Vector Machine (CSVM) and a Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM), and deep neural network models, a Classical Convolutional Neural Network (CCNN) and a Quantum Convolutional Neural Network (QCNN), across four performance dimensions: classification accuracy, computational runtime, parameter count, and memory requirements. Experiments are conducted as functions of both feature dimensionality and sample size, and across CPU and GPU execution environments, providing a controlled, multidimensional comparison to address gaps in prior work. For the SVM-based models, QSVM consistently outperforms CSVM in accuracy, reaching $\sim$ 0.90 versus $\sim$ 0.85 at 1,000 samples, with a higher computational cost. A feature count of 10 qubits and a sample size in the range of 200 -- 500 emerge as practical operating points that balance accuracy and runtime. For the neural network models, CCNN and QCNN achieve comparable classification accuracy, both exceeding 0.96 at 64 features and 60,000 samples, yet QCNN offers substantially superior parameter and memory efficiency, requiring $\sim$ 94\% fewer parameters and $\sim$ 75\% less memory than CCNN at higher feature counts, while incurring higher runtime. Across both model families, quantum models consistently outperform classical models by greater margins in accuracy as feature dimensionality or sample size increases.