Constrained Co-Design for Photonic Bayesian Neural Networks

Classical neural networks frequently produce overconfident predictions on ambiguous or out-of-distribution (OOD) data, a liability that grows with each AI system deployed in safety-critical real-world scenarios. Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) provide a principled framework for uncertainty-aware prediction by replacing deterministic parameters with probability distributions, but repeated sampling increases latency, memory traffic, and energy consumption. Photonic probabilistic computing offers a promising alternative by exploiting intrinsic optical stochasticity for fast and parallel sampling. However, photonic BNNs are not ideal samplers: analog constraints on quantization, programming error, dynamic range, and representable mean and variance restrict the variational families that can be implemented in hardware. In this work, we study which hardware-imposed constraints limit scalable photonic BNN inference, how these constraints can be represented, and which ranges can be tolerated by photonic BNNs beyond small proof-of-concept networks. We formulate photonic BNN inference as constrained stochastic variational inference and perform a systematic ablation study over stochasticity location, stochasticity modality, quantization, programming error, and mean/variance bounds. From these results, we derive concrete co-design guidelines that distinguish hardware constraints that can be compensated by training from those requiring hardware or architecture intervention. We validate these guidelines under coupled, hardware-realistic constraints on Dirty-MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CINIC-10, using Fashion-MNIST and SVHN as OOD benchmarks, showing that hardware-aware training recovers predictive performance and uncertainty quality whenever the required variational family remains representable, whereas violations of representational limits require targeted hardware modifications.

CODES: Benchmarking Coupled ODE Surrogates

We introduce CODES, a benchmark for comprehensive evaluation of surrogate architectures for coupled ODE systems. Besides standard metrics like mean squared error (MSE) and inference time, CODES provides insights into surrogate behaviour across multiple dimensions like interpolation, extrapolation, sparse data, uncertainty quantification and gradient correlation. The benchmark emphasizes usability through features such as integrated parallel training, a web-based configuration generator, and pre-implemented baseline models and datasets. Extensive documentation ensures sustainability and provides the foundation for collaborative improvement. By offering a fair and multi-faceted comparison, CODES helps researchers select the most suitable surrogate for their specific dataset and application while deepening our understanding of surrogate learning behaviour.