MMDG-Bench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Domain Generalization

Multi-modal Domain Generalization (MMDG) seeks to leverage complementary modalities to enhance model robustness on unseen domains. Despite extensive progress in Multi-modal Learning (MML) and Domain Generalization (DG) as individual fields, their systematic integration remains under-explored. Current MMDG research is largely confined to action recognition and lacks standardized evaluation protocols. To address this, we introduce MMDG-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark featuring two foundational frameworks: DG then MML (D2M) and MML then DG (M2D). We provide unified experimental protocols across diverse tasks, including video-audio-flow action recognition and RGB-Depth-IR face anti-spoofing. By instantiating ten MMDG baselines through pairing a unified MML configuration with five DG techniques under both D2M and M2D orderings, we demonstrate that these structured combinations frequently outperform existing state-of-the-art methods, underscoring the necessity of a unified benchmarking effort. Our analysis yields three key insights: (1) Integrating DG techniques provides consistent generalization gains across various backbones, whereas non-DG methods are highly sensitive to backbone shifts; (2) The optimal framework choice depends on inter-modal stability: D2M excels when modal relations are stable across domains, while M2D is more robust to cross-domain relational variance; (3) Stronger backbones yield amplified performance dividends when integrated into our structured frameworks. MMDG-Bench provides a principled foundation and actionable design guidelines for future research in multi-modal robustness. Code is released at https://github.com/qszhan/MMDG-Bench.

To transfer or not transfer: Unified transferability metric and analysis

In transfer learning, transferability is one of the most fundamental problems, which aims to evaluate the effectiveness of arbitrary transfer tasks. Existing research focuses on classification tasks and neglects domain or task differences. More importantly, there is a lack of research to determine whether to transfer or not. To address these, we propose a new analytical approach and metric, Wasserstein Distance based Joint Estimation (WDJE), for transferability estimation and determination in a unified setting: classification and regression problems with domain and task differences. The WDJE facilitates decision-making on whether to transfer or not by comparing the target risk with and without transfer. To enable the comparison, we approximate the target transfer risk by proposing a non-symmetric, easy-to-understand and easy-to-calculate target risk bound that is workable even with limited target labels. The proposed bound relates the target risk to source model performance, domain and task differences based on Wasserstein distance. We also extend our bound into unsupervised settings and establish the generalization bound from finite empirical samples. Our experiments in image classification and remaining useful life regression prediction illustrate the effectiveness of the WDJE in determining whether to transfer or not, and the proposed bound in approximating the target transfer risk.