ERASE -- A Real-World Aligned Benchmark for Unlearning in Recommender Systems

Machine unlearning (MU) enables the removal of selected training data from trained models, to address privacy compliance, security, and liability issues in recommender systems. Existing MU benchmarks poorly reflect real-world recommender settings: they focus primarily on collaborative filtering, assume unrealistically large deletion requests, and overlook practical constraints such as sequential unlearning and efficiency. We present ERASE, a large-scale benchmark for MU in recommender systems designed to align with real-world usage. ERASE spans three core tasks -- collaborative filtering, session-based recommendation, and next-basket recommendation -- and includes unlearning scenarios inspired by real-world applications, such as sequentially removing sensitive interactions or spam. The benchmark covers seven unlearning algorithms, including general-purpose and recommender-specific methods, across nine public datasets and nine state-of-the-art models. We execute ERASE to produce more than 600 GB of reusable artifacts, such as extensive experimental logs and more than a thousand model checkpoints. Crucially, the artifacts that we release enable systematic analysis of where current unlearning methods succeed and where they fall short. ERASE showcases that approximate unlearning can match retraining in some settings, but robustness varies widely across datasets and architectures. Repeated unlearning exposes weaknesses in general-purpose methods, especially for attention-based and recurrent models, while recommender-specific approaches behave more reliably. ERASE provides the empirical foundation to help the community assess, drive, and track progress toward practical MU in recommender systems.

Towards a Real-World Aligned Benchmark for Unlearning in Recommender Systems

Modern recommender systems heavily leverage user interaction data to deliver personalized experiences. However, relying on personal data presents challenges in adhering to privacy regulations, such as the GDPR's "right to be forgotten". Machine unlearning (MU) aims to address these challenges by enabling the efficient removal of specific training data from models post-training, without compromising model utility or leaving residual information. However, current benchmarks for unlearning in recommender systems -- most notably CURE4Rec -- fail to reflect real-world operational demands. They focus narrowly on collaborative filtering, overlook tasks like session-based and next-basket recommendation, simulate unrealistically large unlearning requests, and ignore critical efficiency constraints. In this paper, we propose a set of design desiderata and research questions to guide the development of a more realistic benchmark for unlearning in recommender systems, with the goal of gathering feedback from the research community. Our benchmark proposal spans multiple recommendation tasks, includes domain-specific unlearning scenarios, and several unlearning algorithms -- including ones adapted from a recent NeurIPS unlearning competition. Furthermore, we argue for an unlearning setup that reflects the sequential, time-sensitive nature of real-world deletion requests. We also present a preliminary experiment in a next-basket recommendation setting based on our proposed desiderata and find that unlearning also works for sequential recommendation models, exposed to many small unlearning requests. In this case, we observe that a modification of a custom-designed unlearning algorithm for recommender systems outperforms general unlearning algorithms significantly, and that unlearning can be executed with a latency of only several seconds.