Factor-Informed Uncertainty Distillation for Gaze Estimation

Deep gaze estimation works well in controlled capture but degrades in unconstrained settings, where systems must reject unreliable predictions. Single-pass uncertainty (e.g., heteroscedastic regression) infers uncertainty from pixels without explicit input-validity cues, while sampling based methods are often too costly for real time use. We propose Factor-Informed Uncertainty Distillation (FIUD), a teacher-student framework that aligns uncertainty with interpretable image-quality failure modes. A gradient-boosting teacher predicts expected gaze error from factors such as illumination, sharpness, eye visibility and symmetry; a neural student distills these signals via curriculum learning and ranking supervision into a lightweight single-pass uncertainty head. Across ETH-XGaze, Gaze360, and MPIIFaceGaze (>300k samples), FIUD improves uncertainty, error rank correlation and selective prediction versus deterministic and sampling-based baselines, with the largest gains in unconstrained settings.

Coordinate Singularities Break Conformal Coverage for Gaze and Head Pose

Conformal prediction provides distribution-free reliability guarantees for vision systems, but these guarantees depend on how prediction errors are measured in the output space. Many vision tasks produce outputs on curved spaces (e.g. gaze directions on the sphere or 3D head rotations), yet intermediate prediction heads, residuals, uncertainty estimates, or conformal scores are often defined in flat coordinate charts such as yaw-pitch or Euler angles. We show that this scoring choice introduces systematic geometric distortion near coordinate singularities (large pitch angles on the sphere and poses approaching gimbal lock in 3D rotations). Across four datasets (ETH-XGaze, Gaze360, BIWI, AFLW2000-3D), slice-conditional coverage at a nominal 90% target drops by 30-50 percentage points in these regions, falling to 38.9% on ETH-XGaze and 42.0% on Gaze360 at gaze pitch above 70 degrees, and to 57.5% on BIWI and 55.2% on AFLW2000-3D at head pose pitch above 60 degrees near gimbal lock, despite marginal coverage remaining near 90%. We prove that this is structural. Scalar thresholding changes the size of chart-coordinate prediction sets but leaves their distorted axis ratios unchanged. To diagnose this hidden failure mode, we show that a simple geometric quantity, the Riemannian volume density, strongly correlates with where coverage collapse occurs. Finally, we show that coordinate-free geodesic scoring removes this distortion. It requires no retraining and adds negligible computational cost.