VoicePAT: An Efficient Open-source Evaluation Toolkit for Voice Privacy Research

Speaker anonymization is the task of modifying a speech recording such that the original speaker cannot be identified anymore. Since the first Voice Privacy Challenge in 2020, along with the release of a framework, the popularity of this research topic is continually increasing. However, the comparison and combination of different anonymization approaches remains challenging due to the complexity of evaluation and the absence of user-friendly research frameworks. We therefore propose an efficient speaker anonymization and evaluation framework based on a modular and easily extendable structure, almost fully in Python. The framework facilitates the orchestration of several anonymization approaches in parallel and allows for interfacing between different techniques. Furthermore, we propose modifications to common evaluation methods which make the evaluation more powerful and reduces their computation time by 65 to 95\%, depending on the metric. Our code is fully open source.

Neural Machine Translation for the Indigenous Languages of the Americas: An Introduction

Neural models have drastically advanced state of the art for machine translation (MT) between high-resource languages. Traditionally, these models rely on large amounts of training data, but many language pairs lack these resources. However, an important part of the languages in the world do not have this amount of data. Most languages from the Americas are among them, having a limited amount of parallel and monolingual data, if any. Here, we present an introduction to the interested reader to the basic challenges, concepts, and techniques that involve the creation of MT systems for these languages. Finally, we discuss the recent advances and findings and open questions, product of an increased interest of the NLP community in these languages.

Ethical Considerations for Machine Translation of Indigenous Languages: Giving a Voice to the Speakers

In recent years machine translation has become very successful for high-resource language pairs. This has also sparked new interest in research on the automatic translation of low-resource languages, including Indigenous languages. However, the latter are deeply related to the ethnic and cultural groups that speak (or used to speak) them. The data collection, modeling and deploying machine translation systems thus result in new ethical questions that must be addressed. Motivated by this, we first survey the existing literature on ethical considerations for the documentation, translation, and general natural language processing for Indigenous languages. Afterward, we conduct and analyze an interview study to shed light on the positions of community leaders, teachers, and language activists regarding ethical concerns for the automatic translation of their languages. Our results show that the inclusion, at different degrees, of native speakers and community members is vital to performing better and more ethical research on Indigenous languages.

Neighboring Words Affect Human Interpretation of Saliency Explanations

Word-level saliency explanations ("heat maps over words") are often used to communicate feature-attribution in text-based models. Recent studies found that superficial factors such as word length can distort human interpretation of the communicated saliency scores. We conduct a user study to investigate how the marking of a word's neighboring words affect the explainee's perception of the word's importance in the context of a saliency explanation. We find that neighboring words have significant effects on the word's importance rating. Concretely, we identify that the influence changes based on neighboring direction (left vs. right) and a-priori linguistic and computational measures of phrases and collocations (vs. unrelated neighboring words). Our results question whether text-based saliency explanations should be continued to be communicated at word level, and inform future research on alternative saliency explanation methods.

Modeling Speaker-Listener Interaction for Backchannel Prediction

We present our latest findings on backchannel modeling novelly motivated by the canonical use of the minimal responses Yeah and Uh-huh in English and their correspondent tokens in German, and the effect of encoding the speaker-listener interaction. Backchanneling theories emphasize the active and continuous role of the listener in the course of the conversation, their effects on the speaker's subsequent talk, and the consequent dynamic speaker-listener interaction. Therefore, we propose a neural-based acoustic backchannel classifier on minimal responses by processing acoustic features from the speaker speech, capturing and imitating listeners' backchanneling behavior, and encoding speaker-listener interaction. Our experimental results on the Switchboard and GECO datasets reveal that in almost all tested scenarios the speaker or listener behavior embeddings help the model make more accurate backchannel predictions. More importantly, a proper interaction encoding strategy, i.e., combining the speaker and listener embeddings, leads to the best performance on both datasets in terms of F1-score.

Oh, Jeez! or Uh-huh? A Listener-aware Backchannel Predictor on ASR Transcriptions

This paper presents our latest investigation on modeling backchannel in conversations. Motivated by a proactive backchanneling theory, we aim at developing a system which acts as a proactive listener by inserting backchannels, such as continuers and assessment, to influence speakers. Our model takes into account not only lexical and acoustic cues, but also introduces the simple and novel idea of using listener embeddings to mimic different backchanneling behaviours. Our experimental results on the Switchboard benchmark dataset reveal that acoustic cues are more important than lexical cues in this task and their combination with listener embeddings works best on both, manual transcriptions and automatically generated transcriptions.

Conversational Tree Search: A New Hybrid Dialog Task

Conversational interfaces provide a flexible and easy way for users to seek information that may otherwise be difficult or inconvenient to obtain. However, existing interfaces generally fall into one of two categories: FAQs, where users must have a concrete question in order to retrieve a general answer, or dialogs, where users must follow a predefined path but may receive a personalized answer. In this paper, we introduce Conversational Tree Search (CTS) as a new task that bridges the gap between FAQ-style information retrieval and task-oriented dialog, allowing domain-experts to define dialog trees which can then be converted to an efficient dialog policy that learns only to ask the questions necessary to navigate a user to their goal. We collect a dataset for the travel reimbursement domain and demonstrate a baseline as well as a novel deep Reinforcement Learning architecture for this task. Our results show that the new architecture combines the positive aspects of both the FAQ and dialog system used in the baseline and achieves higher goal completion while skipping unnecessary questions.

ArzEn-ST: A Three-way Speech Translation Corpus for Code-Switched Egyptian Arabic - English

We present our work on collecting ArzEn-ST, a code-switched Egyptian Arabic - English Speech Translation Corpus. This corpus is an extension of the ArzEn speech corpus, which was collected through informal interviews with bilingual speakers. In this work, we collect translations in both directions, monolingual Egyptian Arabic and monolingual English, forming a three-way speech translation corpus. We make the translation guidelines and corpus publicly available. We also report results for baseline systems for machine translation and speech translation tasks. We believe this is a valuable resource that can motivate and facilitate further research studying the code-switching phenomenon from a linguistic perspective and can be used to train and evaluate NLP systems.

Anonymizing Speech with Generative Adversarial Networks to Preserve Speaker Privacy

In order to protect the privacy of speech data, speaker anonymization aims for hiding the identity of a speaker by changing the voice in speech recordings. This typically comes with a privacy-utility trade-off between protection of individuals and usability of the data for downstream applications. One of the challenges in this context is to create non-existent voices that sound as natural as possible. In this work, we propose to tackle this issue by generating speaker embeddings using a generative adversarial network with Wasserstein distance as cost function. By incorporating these artificial embeddings into a speech-to-text-to-speech pipeline, we outperform previous approaches in terms of privacy and utility. According to standard objective metrics and human evaluation, our approach generates intelligible and content-preserving yet privacy-protecting versions of the original recordings.

How (Not) To Evaluate Explanation Quality

The importance of explainability is increasingly acknowledged in natural language processing. However, it is still unclear how the quality of explanations can be assessed effectively. The predominant approach is to compare proxy scores (such as BLEU or explanation F1) evaluated against gold explanations in the dataset. The assumption is that an increase of the proxy score implies a higher utility of explanations to users. In this paper, we question this assumption. In particular, we (i) formulate desired characteristics of explanation quality that apply across tasks and domains, (ii) point out how current evaluation practices violate those characteristics, and (iii) propose actionable guidelines to overcome obstacles that limit today's evaluation of explanation quality and to enable the development of explainable systems that provide tangible benefits for human users. We substantiate our theoretical claims (i.e., the lack of validity and temporal decline of currently-used proxy scores) with empirical evidence from a crowdsourcing case study in which we investigate the explanation quality of state-of-the-art explainable question answering systems.