HP2-SLAM: Adaptive Hybrid ICP for Robust and Efficient LiDAR SLAM

Achieving robustness, accuracy, and efficiency simultaneously remains a central challenge in light detection and ranging (LiDAR) simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM). While learning-based approaches deliver strong benchmark performance, they often require extensive training, substantial computational resources, and struggle to generalize to unseen or degenerate environments. Geometry-based methods are efficient and interpretable, yet their performance degrades in planar or repetitive scenes due to limitations of standard iterative closest point (ICP) formulations. We present HP2-SLAM, a minimalist yet robust LiDAR SLAM framework built around a neighborhood-size adaptive hybrid ICP. Our key insight is a planarity-aware adaptive threshold that dynamically classifies correspondences based on local geometric structure and density, thereby enabling a principled balance between point-to-plane and point-to-point residuals. This formulation stabilizes alignment in both structured and degenerate environments without feature engineering, learning modules, or dataset-specific tuning. Integrated into a complete SLAM pipeline with submap management, loop closure detection, and pose graph optimization, HP2-SLAM consistently outperforms strong geometry-based baselines across publicly available datasets while maintaining real-time performance on commodity hardware. Our results demonstrate that carefully designed geometric adaptation can achieve strong generalization and robustness without sacrificing simplicity or efficiency.

How Robust Are LLMs to Vietnamese Dialects?

Large Language Models (LLMs) are typically evaluated on standard written Vietnamese, yet everyday communication frequently involves regional dialects that preserve meaning but differ in surface form. Existing Vietnamese dialect work largely addresses this issue through dialect-to-standard normalization instead of measuring how the model fails under Vietnamese dialectal inputs. To address this gap, we present the first systematic evaluation of LLM robustness to Vietnamese dialect variation across multiple tasks, quantifying performance degradation and failure patterns. We introduce VialectBench (Vietnamese Dialects Benchmarking), a controlled benchmark for testing whether model decisions remain stable across six Vietnamese dialect groups. VialectBench contains 400 Standard Vietnamese source instances and 2,400 human-written dialectal rewrites spanning emotion recognition (ER), natural language inference (NLI), question answering (QA), and multiple-choice question answering (MCQA). Dataset evaluation with a fixed reference language model shows that the dialectal rewrites induce a measurable model-relative likelihood shift while remaining nearly equal in length to their Standard counterparts. Across ten instruction-tuned models, dialectal inputs reduce average performance by 2.82%, and no evaluated model is fully dialect-invariant. All four tasks are affected, with QA showing the largest average degradation. Robustness also varies substantially across dialect groups: PNT3 and PNT2 cause the largest average performance drops, at 6.17% and 4.73%, respectively, whereas PNB slightly improves average performance by 0.42%. The Central dialect group (PNT1-PNT4) also yields the highest average harmful-flip rate across all models, at 6.54%. These findings show that strong performance on Standard Vietnamese does not guarantee reliable behavior under meaning-preserving regional variation.

Domain-Dependent Knowledge in Answer Set Planning

In this paper we consider three different kinds of domain-dependent control knowledge (temporal, procedural and HTN-based) that are useful in planning. Our approach is declarative and relies on the language of logic programming with answer set semantics (AnsProlog*). AnsProlog* is designed to plan without control knowledge. We show how temporal, procedural and HTN-based control knowledge can be incorporated into AnsProlog* by the modular addition of a small number of domain-dependent rules, without the need to modify the planner. We formally prove the correctness of our planner, both in the absence and presence of the control knowledge. Finally, we perform some initial experimentation that demonstrates the potential reduction in planning time that can be achieved when procedural domain knowledge is used to solve planning problems with large plan length.