Metrics for quantifying isotropy in high dimensional unsupervised clustering tasks in a materials context

Clustering is a common task in machine learning, but clusters of unlabelled data can be hard to quantify. The application of clustering algorithms in chemistry is often dependant on material representation. Ascertaining the effects of different representations, clustering algorithms, or data transformations on the resulting clusters is difficult due to the dimensionality of these data. We present a thorough analysis of measures for isotropy of a cluster, including a novel implantation based on an existing derivation. Using fractional anisotropy, a common method used in medical imaging for comparison, we then expand these measures to examine the average isotropy of a set of clusters. A use case for such measures is demonstrated by quantifying the effects of kernel approximation functions on different representations of the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database. Broader applicability of these methods is demonstrated in analysing learnt embedding of the MNIST dataset. Random clusters are explored to examine the differences between isotropy measures presented, and to see how each method scales with the dimensionality. Python implementations of these measures are provided for use by the community.

Element selection for functional materials discovery by integrated machine learning of atomic contributions to properties

At the high level, the fundamental differences between materials originate from the unique nature of the constituent chemical elements. Before specific differences emerge according to the precise ratios of elements (composition) in a given crystal structure (phase), the material can be represented by its phase field defined simply as the set of the constituent chemical elements. Classification of the materials at the level of their phase fields can accelerate materials discovery by selecting the elemental combinations that are likely to produce desirable functional properties in synthetically accessible materials. Here, we demonstrate that classification of the materials phase field with respect to the maximum expected value of a target functional property can be combined with the ranking of the materials synthetic accessibility. This end-to-end machine learning approach (PhaseSelect) first derives the atomic characteristics from the compositional environments in all computationally and experimentally explored materials and then employs these characteristics to classify the phase field by their merit. PhaseSelect can quantify the materials potential at the level of the periodic table, which we demonstrate with significant accuracy for three avenues of materials applications: high-temperature superconducting, high-temperature magnetic and targetted energy band gap materials.