Abstract:This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the results from the Third International Competition on Document Forgery Detection on ID-Cards and Passports, which was held across two distinct tracks. Track 1 evaluates a synthetic-data-based ID-PAD system under controlled but diverse conditions, where the winning team, \textit{Incode}, achieves an $AV_{Rank}$ of 27.82%, confirming consistent performance across metrics and highlighting the importance of a balanced, generalizable design. In Track 2, the challenge intensifies with heterogeneous attack scenarios across different domains, where \textit{Incode} again achieved the top position with an $AV_{Rank}$ of 68.71% across thresholds, outperforming some baselines and established methods. These results demonstrate that PAD effectiveness requires not only high accuracy but also consistency across diverse attack types and imaging conditions. The success of this initiative across both tracks underscores the value of collaboration between companies and academic teams. This year, more than \textit{63 teams} were registered, and more than \textit{100 submission models} were evaluated. This competition has evolved into a leading benchmark state-of-the-art in PAD on ID documents, setting the standard for performance, reproducibility, and real-world applicability in secure identity verification.
Abstract:This work summarises and reports the results of the second Presentation Attack Detection competition on ID cards. This new version includes new elements compared to the previous one. (1) An automatic evaluation platform was enabled for automatic benchmarking; (2) Two tracks were proposed in order to evaluate algorithms and datasets, respectively; and (3) A new ID card dataset was shared with Track 1 teams to serve as the baseline dataset for the training and optimisation. The Hochschule Darmstadt, Fraunhofer-IGD, and Facephi company jointly organised this challenge. 20 teams were registered, and 74 submitted models were evaluated. For Track 1, the "Dragons" team reached first place with an Average Ranking and Equal Error rate (EER) of AV-Rank of 40.48% and 11.44% EER, respectively. For the more challenging approach in Track 2, the "Incode" team reached the best results with an AV-Rank of 14.76% and 6.36% EER, improving on the results of the first edition of 74.30% and 21.87% EER, respectively. These results suggest that PAD on ID cards is improving, but it is still a challenging problem related to the number of images, especially of bona fide images.