Distill What the Student Can See: Fisher-Projected On-Policy Distillation for Vision-Language Models

On-policy distillation (OPD) samples trajectories from the current student policy and minimizes token-level divergence between student and teacher next-token distributions at prefixes along those trajectories. This aligns the distillation states with the student's own generation distribution. However, it still assumes that the complete teacher distribution is an appropriate target across student capacities. In vision--language reasoning, teacher corrections can depend on visual distinctions that a compact student cannot represent. Our target-scaling study shows that, as the target approaches the complete teacher distribution, the student realizes less of the prescribed shift and obtains worse downstream performance. We therefore propose \emph{Fisher-Projected On-Policy Distillation} (FP-OPD), which distills only locally realizable teacher corrections. FP-OPD uses continuous visual perturbations to estimate the student's local visual tangent space and projects the centered teacher--student log-probability gap onto this space under the student's Fisher metric. The resulting capacity-aware target is optimized with full-vocabulary reverse KL on student trajectories, retaining the standard OPD framework. In 8B-to-2B distillation, FP-OPD improves all seven evaluated multimodal benchmarks. It raises the average score by 2.77 points over the pretrained student and by 1.60 points over standard OPD. These results demonstrate that locally realizable teacher corrections provide a more effective target for distilling compact vision--language models.

Correcting What You Cannot See: Credit Assignment for Perception Distillation in Multimodal Reasoners

On-policy distillation provides dense supervision for multimodal reasoners, but its trajectory-level reward cannot determine whether a failed answer arose from perception or subsequent reasoning. Perception Success Rate (PSR), estimated from multiple reasonings sharing one perception, remains ambiguous because low success conflates perceptual insufficiency with reasoning difficulty. We introduce \textbf{Perception-Correction Distillation (PCD)}, a label-free method that identifies correctable perception failures using downstream failure and teacher--student disagreement as complementary witnesses. Their product, , forms a soft AND gate that strengthens distillation only when both witnesses are present. We motivate this rule through Bayesian evidence combination and show that multiplication is the unique normalized bilinear gate that vanishes when either witness is absent. PCD uses separated perception--reasoning rollouts and mean-preserving weights, leaving the reasoning objective unchanged. Across eight benchmarks, PCD improves the 8B 2B macro average from 44.50 with OPD to 47.28 and the 32B 8B result from 56.94 to 61.22. In matched 2B ablations, removing PCD and separated rollout reduces held-out average by 2.22 and 0.88 points, respectively. Effective multimodal distillation therefore depends not only on what the teacher predicts, but also on identifying when perception is the appropriate target of correction.

MULTIBENCH++: A Unified and Comprehensive Multimodal Fusion Benchmarking Across Specialized Domains

Although multimodal fusion has made significant progress, its advancement is severely hindered by the lack of adequate evaluation benchmarks. Current fusion methods are typically evaluated on a small selection of public datasets, a limited scope that inadequately represents the complexity and diversity of real-world scenarios, potentially leading to biased evaluations. This issue presents a twofold challenge. On one hand, models may overfit to the biases of specific datasets, hindering their generalization to broader practical applications. On the other hand, the absence of a unified evaluation standard makes fair and objective comparisons between different fusion methods difficult. Consequently, a truly universal and high-performance fusion model has yet to emerge. To address these challenges, we have developed a large-scale, domain-adaptive benchmark for multimodal evaluation. This benchmark integrates over 30 datasets, encompassing 15 modalities and 20 predictive tasks across key application domains. To complement this, we have also developed an open-source, unified, and automated evaluation pipeline that includes standardized implementations of state-of-the-art models and diverse fusion paradigms. Leveraging this platform, we have conducted large-scale experiments, successfully establishing new performance baselines across multiple tasks. This work provides the academic community with a crucial platform for rigorous and reproducible assessment of multimodal models, aiming to propel the field of multimodal artificial intelligence to new heights.