Integrating Physics-Based and Data-Driven Approaches for Probabilistic Building Energy Modeling

Building energy modeling is a key tool for optimizing the performance of building energy systems. Historically, a wide spectrum of methods has been explored -- ranging from conventional physics-based models to purely data-driven techniques. Recently, hybrid approaches that combine the strengths of both paradigms have gained attention. These include strategies such as learning surrogates for physics-based models, modeling residuals between simulated and observed data, fine-tuning surrogates with real-world measurements, using physics-based outputs as additional inputs for data-driven models, and integrating the physics-based output into the loss function the data-driven model. Despite this progress, two significant research gaps remain. First, most hybrid methods focus on deterministic modeling, often neglecting the inherent uncertainties caused by factors like weather fluctuations and occupant behavior. Second, there has been little systematic comparison within a probabilistic modeling framework. This study addresses these gaps by evaluating five representative hybrid approaches for probabilistic building energy modeling, focusing on quantile predictions of building thermodynamics in a real-world case study. Our results highlight two main findings. First, the performance of hybrid approaches varies across different building room types, but residual learning with a Feedforward Neural Network performs best on average. Notably, the residual approach is the only model that produces physically intuitive predictions when applied to out-of-distribution test data. Second, Quantile Conformal Prediction is an effective procedure for calibrating quantile predictions in case of indoor temperature modeling.

Benchmarks and Custom Package for Electrical Load Forecasting

Load forecasting is of great significance in the power industry as it can provide a reference for subsequent tasks such as power grid dispatch, thus bringing huge economic benefits. However, there are many differences between load forecasting and traditional time series forecasting. On the one hand, load forecasting aims to minimize the cost of subsequent tasks such as power grid dispatch, rather than simply pursuing prediction accuracy. On the other hand, the load is largely influenced by many external factors, such as temperature or calendar variables. In addition, the scale of predictions (such as building-level loads and aggregated-level loads) can also significantly impact the predicted results. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive load forecasting archive, which includes load domain-specific feature engineering to help forecasting models better model load data. In addition, different from the traditional loss function which only aims for accuracy, we also provide a method to customize the loss function based on the forecasting error, integrating it into our forecasting framework. Based on this, we conducted extensive experiments on load data at different levels, providing a reference for researchers to compare different load forecasting models.