Who Determines the Meaning of an Emotion? Affective Sovereignty as an Epistemic Consequence of Measurement Limits

Emotion-sensing AI is rapidly becoming embedded in vehicles, home appliances, dialogue agents, and social infrastructure, giving rise to a sphere in which emotion is no longer confined to individual experience but is instead observed and computed at a societal scale, a domain we term the Affectosphere. Yet a central normative question in this domain has remained underexplored: who has the final authority to determine the meaning of one's own emotion? This study addresses the question from the epistemological side of measurement's structural limits. We define a meaning distribution as the distribution of labels assigned by annotators drawn from a population under a fixed annotation protocol, and decompose its uncertainty into reducible and irreducible components. We then demonstrate that, while emotion AI can assign high-confidence point labels and discriminate real differences at an aggregate level, the irreducible component of the meaning distribution for individual instances cannot be estimated with adequate coverage under realistic annotator counts, a systematic divergence we term the epistemic gap. The key finding is that high device confidence does not constitute evidence that irrecoverable meaning has been recovered. From this epistemic gap, together with an explicitly stated normative premise, namely that the output of a system which cannot recover a quantity in principle must not be treated as its authoritative determination, we derive the norm that the final interpretive authority over the meaning of one's emotion is procedurally reserved for the experiencing subject, the norm of affective sovereignty. These results suggest that the design, evaluation, and regulation of emotion AI should place explicit allocation of interpretive authority, rather than accuracy maximisation, at their core.

Safety-Aware Evaluation of LLM-Generated Driver Intervention Messages through Multi-Task Risk Fusion

Existing driver intervention systems rely on auditory alerts and fixed templates, failing to leverage multi-task recognition outputs. General-purpose metrics such as BLEU and BERTScore cannot capture intervention-specific quality dimensions including risk-urgency alignment, cognitive load, and driver acceptability. In this paper, we propose the Driver Safety-Aware Intervention Score (DSAIS), a domain-specific metric evaluating five dimensions through a hybrid architecture combining lightweight rule-based computation with LLM Judge evaluation, together with an end-to-end framework integrating four-task recognition outputs into an LLM through risk fusion, state history management, and dynamic prompt construction. Experiments on the AIDE dataset with five models and seven conditions demonstrate that DSAIS achieves ICC 0.798-0.840 across three architecturally distinct judges and Cohen's d > 1.5 across all control conditions. Multi-dimensional sub-score analysis quantifies the contextual adaptability gap between rule-based and LLM-based systems, revealing that multi-task integration improves contextual relevance by 9.1% over rule-based baselines. Ablation experiments demonstrate that each framework component contributes to contextual relevance, with sub-score decomposition revealing gains that aggregate scoring masks. Driver emotion recognition is identified as the most critical upstream factor, and compact local LLMs (7B--9B parameters) achieve quality superior to API-based models, providing practical design guidelines for in-vehicle deployment.

Interpretable Uncertainty Routing Separating Emotion Ambiguity from Distribution Shift in Facial Expression Recognition

Facial expression recognition (FER) is inherently ambiguous: human annotators frequently disagree, and models deployed in real environments face distribution shift. Crucially, these two conditions demand different downstream actions, as ambiguous in-distribution faces should be reported with their ambiguity whereas out-of-distribution inputs should be rejected. However, a single uncertainty score conflates the two. In this study, uncertainty decomposition into aleatoric and epistemic components for FER is investigated, and Uncertainty-Aware Routing (UAR), an inference-time routing mechanism that exploits the separation, is introduced. Specifically, aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties are obtained from a Deep Ensemble of fully fine-tuned DINOv2 models and are each validated against an independent external signal: aleatoric against human annotator disagreement, and epistemic against distribution shift induced by image corruptions. The proposed dual-validation protocol reveals that aleatoric recovers annotator disagreement with Spearman correlation 0.66 (95% CI: 0.64-0.68), and epistemic detects corruption-induced shifts, achieving average AUROC of 0.699 at the highest corruption severity. UAR retains approximately 1.8 times more ambiguous in-distribution faces than single-uncertainty routing at a matched out-of-distribution rejection rate. A strong label-distribution-learning baseline achieves comparable disagreement recovery but cannot separate ambiguity from shift and therefore cannot route, establishing that the value of decomposition lies in the separation enabling interpretable and differentiated action selection.

Bayesian Spectral Emotion Transition Discovery from Multi-Annotator Disagreement

Emotions evolve through the dynamics of conversation, and understanding their transition structure is foundational to applications ranging from mental-health screening to dialogue systems. However, existing studies typically compress multi-rater judgments into a single hard label by majority voting, discarding the uncertainty signal needed to understand turn-to-turn transitions. In this article, we propose Bayesian Spectral Emotion Transition Discovery (BSETD), a two-stage framework that discovers emotion-transition structure from multi-rater soft labels. In the first stage, a hierarchical Dirichlet-Multinomial posterior is constructed through the outer product of soft labels, equipping each cell of the K x K transition matrix with a credible interval and Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) false discovery rate (FDR)-controlled significance. In the second stage, the symmetrized graph Laplacian is spectrally decomposed to separate a low-frequency (inertia) component from a high-frequency (contagion) component. On EmotionLines, BSETD simultaneously recovers the signatures of two distinct affective spaces: the Plutchik-adjacent transitions disgust to anger (log2 lift +0.94) and anger to disgust (+0.86) are over-represented, while the Russell-valence-reversed transitions joy to anger (-0.90) and anger to joy (-0.89) are under-represented. A five-source cross-corpus validation yields pairwise Pearson correlations in 0.91-0.98 within English, 0.79-0.85 against Chinese M3ED, and 0.979 between the human hard labels and the LLM virtual soft labels on the same utterance set, demonstrating that a pipeline preserving annotator uncertainty bridges the computational study of emotion dynamics with established psychological theory.

Uncertainty Decomposition via Cyclical SG-MCMC and Soft-label Learning for Subjective NLP

Annotator disagreement in emotion classification reflects ambiguity intrinsic to emotion concepts and is essential for predictor-quality assessment in subjective NLP. Yet no prior work integrates soft-label learning with Bayesian deep learning to evaluate uncertainty along axes including annotator-distribution fidelity. We train a linear head on a frozen RoBERTa via cyclical stochastic gradient Markov chain Monte Carlo (cSG-MCMC), targeting the empirical annotator distribution with a soft-label objective under a five-axis evaluation. On the 28-emotion GoEmotions benchmark, the proposed method outperforms Monte Carlo Dropout and Deep Ensemble simultaneously on three axes -- Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD) to the annotator distribution, Spearman correlation between per-emotion aleatoric uncertainty and disagreement, and selective-prediction Area Under the Risk-Coverage Curve (AURC) and Area Under the ROC Curve (AUROC) -- showing independent axes are jointly attainable from one posterior. Post-hoc temperature scaling exhibits a bidirectional effect, establishing hard-label calibration and annotator-JSD as independent dimensions and motivating joint reporting as an honest protocol.

Cognitive-Causal Multi-Task Learning with Psychological State Conditioning for Assistive Driving Perception

Multi-task learning for advanced driver assistance systems requires modeling the complex interplay between driver internal states and external traffic environments. However, existing methods treat recognition tasks as flat and independent objectives, failing to exploit the cognitive causal structure underlying driving behavior. In this paper, we propose CauPsi, a cognitive science-grounded causal multi-task learning framework that explicitly models the hierarchical dependencies among Traffic Context Recognition (TCR), Vehicle Context Recognition (VCR), Driver Emotion Recognition (DER), and Driver Behavior Recognition (DBR). The proposed framework introduces two key mechanisms. First, a Causal Task Chain propagates upstream task predictions to downstream tasks via learnable prototype embeddings, realizing the cognitive cascade from environmental perception to behavioral regulation in a differentiable manner. Second, Cross-Task Psychological Conditioning (CTPC) estimates a psychological state signal from driver facial expressions and body posture and injects it as a conditioning input to all tasks including environmental recognition, thereby modeling the modulatory effect of driver internal states on cognitive and decision-making processes. Evaluated on the AIDE dataset, CauPsi achieves a mean accuracy of 82.71% with only 5.05M parameters, surpassing prior work by +1.0% overall, with notable improvements on DER (+3.65%) and DBR (+7.53%). Ablation studies validate the independent contribution of each component, and analysis of the psychological state signal confirms that it acquires systematic task-label-dependent patterns in a self-supervised manner without explicit psychological annotations.

Does AI Homogenize Student Thinking? A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Structural Convergence in AI-Augmented Essays

While AI-assisted writing has been widely reported to improve essay quality, its impact on the structural diversity of student thinking remains unexplored. Analyzing 6,875 essays across five conditions (Human-only, AI-only, and three Human+AI prompt strategies), we provide the first empirical evidence of a Quality-Homogenization Tradeoff, in which substantial quality gains co-occur with significant homogenization. The effect is dimension-specific: cohesion architecture lost 70-78% of its variance, whereas perspective plurality was diversified. Convergence target analysis further revealed that AI-augmented essays were pulled toward AI structural patterns yet deviated significantly from the Human-AI axis, indicating simultaneous partial replacement and partial emergence. Crucially, prompt specificity reversed homogenization into diversification on argument depth, demonstrating that homogenization is not an intrinsic property of AI but a function of interaction design.

Multi-Agent Large Language Model Based Emotional Detoxification Through Personalized Intensity Control for Consumer Protection

In the attention economy, sensational content exposes consumers to excessive emotional stimulation, hindering calm decision-making. This study proposes Multi-Agent LLM-based Emotional deToxification (MALLET), a multi-agent information sanitization system consisting of four agents: Emotion Analysis, Emotion Adjustment, Balance Monitoring, and Personal Guide. The Emotion Analysis Agent quantifies stimulus intensity using a 6-emotion BERT classifier, and the Emotion Adjustment Agent rewrites texts into two presentation modes, BALANCED (neutralized text) and COOL (neutralized text + supplementary text), using an LLM. The Balance Monitoring Agent aggregates weekly information consumption patterns and generates personalized advice, while the Personal Guide Agent recommends a presentation mode according to consumer sensitivity. Experiments on 800 AG News articles demonstrated significant stimulus score reduction (up to 19.3%) and improved emotion balance while maintaining semantic preservation. Near-zero correlation between stimulus reduction and semantic preservation confirmed that the two are independently controllable. Category-level analysis revealed substantial reduction (17.8-33.8%) in Sports, Business, and Sci/Tech, whereas the effect was limited in the World category, where facts themselves are inherently high-stimulus. The proposed system provides a framework for supporting calm information reception of consumers without restricting access to the original text.

Argument Rarity-based Originality Assessment for AI-Assisted Writing

As Large Language Models (LLMs) have become capable of effortlessly generating high-quality text, traditional quality-focused writing assessment is losing its significance. If the essential goal of education is to foster critical thinking and original perspectives, assessment must also shift its paradigm from quality to originality. This study proposes Argument Rarity-based Originality Assessment (AROA), a framework for automatically evaluating argumentative originality in student essays. AROA defines originality as rarity within a reference corpus and evaluates it through four complementary components: structural rarity, claim rarity, evidence rarity, and cognitive depth. The framework quantifies the rarity of each component using density estimation and integrates them with a quality adjustment mechanism, thereby treating quality and originality as independent evaluation axes. Experiments using human essays and AI-generated essays revealed a strong negative correlation between quality and claim rarity, demonstrating a quality-originality trade-off where higher-quality texts tend to rely on typical claim patterns. Furthermore, while AI essays achieved comparable levels of structural complexity to human essays, their claim rarity was substantially lower than that of humans, indicating that LLMs can reproduce the form of argumentation but have limitations in the originality of content.

Who Does This Name Remind You of? Nationality Prediction via Large Language Model Associative Memory

Large language models (LLMs) possess extensive world knowledge, yet methods for effectively eliciting this knowledge remain underexplored. Nationality and region prediction tasks require understanding of not only linguistic features but also cultural and historical background, making LLM world knowledge particularly valuable. However, conventional LLM prompting methods rely on direct reasoning approaches, which have limitations in applying abstract linguistic rules. We propose LLM Associative Memory Agents (LAMA), a novel framework that leverages LLM world knowledge as associative memory. Rather than directly inferring nationality from names, LAMA recalls famous individuals with the same name and aggregates their nationalities through indirect reasoning. A dual-agent architecture comprising a Person Agent and a Media Agent, specialized in different knowledge domains, recalls famous individuals in parallel, generating Top-1 predictions through voting and Top-K predictions through conditional completion. On a 99-country nationality prediction task, LAMA achieved 0.817 accuracy, substantially outperforming conventional LLM prompting methods and neural models. Our experiments reveal that LLMs exhibit higher reliability in recalling concrete examples than in abstract reasoning, that recall-based approaches are robust to low-frequency nationalities independent of data frequency distributions, and that the dual-agent architecture functions complementarily to produce synergistic effects. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of a new multi-agent system that retrieves and aggregates LLM knowledge rather than prompting reasoning.