AssistDLO: Assistive Teleoperation for Deformable Linear Object Manipulation

Manipulating Deformable Linear Objects (DLOs) is challenging in robotics due to their infinite-dimensional configuration space and complex nonlinear dynamics. In teleoperation, depth uncertainty hinders state perception and reaction. AssistDLO addresses this challenge as an assistive teleoperation framework for DLO manipulation that combines real-time multi-view state estimation, visual assistance (VA), and a geometry-aware shared-autonomy controller based on Control Barrier Functions (SA-CBF). While traditional shared autonomy methods often rely on simple geometric attractors and may fail to preserve DLO geometry, SA-CBF acts as a geometry-aware funnel, facilitating precise grasping while preserving the operator's high-level authority. The framework is evaluated in a bimanual knot-untangling user study (N = 22) using ropes with varying length and rigidity. Results show that the effectiveness of the assistance depends strongly on operator expertise and DLO properties. SA-CBF provides the strongest gains for naive users, acting as a skill equalizer that increases task success from 71% to 88%, and is effective for stiffer ropes. Conversely, expert users prefer VA, and highly compliant, long ropes benefit more from visual support than localized action assistance. Ultimately, these findings demonstrate that effective DLO teleoperation cannot rely on a fixed strategy, highlighting the critical need for adaptive, user-aware, and material-aware shared autonomy.

A Safety-Aware Shared Autonomy Framework with BarrierIK Using Control Barrier Functions

Shared autonomy blends operator intent with autonomous assistance. In cluttered environments, linear blending can produce unsafe commands even when each source is individually collision-free. Many existing approaches model obstacle avoidance through potentials or cost terms, which only enforce safety as a soft constraint. In contrast, safety-critical control requires hard guarantees. We investigate the use of control barrier functions (CBFs) at the inverse kinematics (IK) layer of shared autonomy, targeting post-blend safety while preserving task performance. Our approach is evaluated in simulation on representative cluttered environments and in a VR teleoperation study comparing pure teleoperation with shared autonomy. Across conditions, employing CBFs at the IK layer reduces violation time and increases minimum clearance while maintaining task performance. In the user study, participants reported higher perceived safety and trust, lower interference, and an overall preference for shared autonomy with our safety filter. Additional materials available at https://berkguler.github.io/barrierik.

Constrained Gaussian Process Motion Planning via Stein Variational Newton Inference

Gaussian Process Motion Planning (GPMP) is a widely used framework for generating smooth trajectories within a limited compute time--an essential requirement in many robotic applications. However, traditional GPMP approaches often struggle with enforcing hard nonlinear constraints and rely on Maximum a Posteriori (MAP) solutions that disregard the full Bayesian posterior. This limits planning diversity and ultimately hampers decision-making. Recent efforts to integrate Stein Variational Gradient Descent (SVGD) into motion planning have shown promise in handling complex constraints. Nonetheless, these methods still face persistent challenges, such as difficulties in strictly enforcing constraints and inefficiencies when the probabilistic inference problem is poorly conditioned. To address these issues, we propose a novel constrained Stein Variational Gaussian Process Motion Planning (cSGPMP) framework, incorporating a GPMP prior specifically designed for trajectory optimization under hard constraints. Our approach improves the efficiency of particle-based inference while explicitly handling nonlinear constraints. This advancement significantly broadens the applicability of GPMP to motion planning scenarios demanding robust Bayesian inference, strict constraint adherence, and computational efficiency within a limited time. We validate our method on standard benchmarks, achieving an average success rate of 98.57% across 350 planning tasks, significantly outperforming competitive baselines. This demonstrates the ability of our method to discover and use diverse trajectory modes, enhancing flexibility and adaptability in complex environments, and delivering significant improvements over standard baselines without incurring major computational costs.