Towards General Language-Conditioned Latent Safety Filters

Robot policies are becoming increasingly general, with vision-language-action (VLA) models enabling a single policy to execute diverse tasks specified in natural language. Safe deployment, however, requires adapting not only to new tasks but also to varying safety requirements across users, environments, and applications. Existing safety filters remain largely constraint-specific and thus must be redesigned or relearned when safety requirements change. In this paper, we investigate language-conditioned safety filtering, in which a Hamilton-Jacobi safety actor and critic are conditioned on language-specified constraints. We evaluate this formulation across pick-and-place, table-wiping, and block-stacking tasks in the vision-based setting, examining its ability to enforce language-specified constraints and transfer to unseen constraint instances within the evaluated constraint families. Our experiments provide evidence that language-conditioned safety filters reduce constraint violations and exhibit partial transfer to unseen constraint instances.

On the Limits of Sampling-Based Reachability: Geometry, Dynamics, and Sample Complexity

Reachability analysis is central to safety-critical control, robotics, and neural network verification, but classical computational methods, such as Hamilton--Jacobi reachability and set propagation, scale poorly with state dimension. Sampling-based methods have emerged as a promising alternative, often providing finite-sample guarantees that bound the probability-mass left uncovered. However, an explicit account of how the geometry of the initial set, the dynamics, and the sampling law affect the accuracy of the estimator is not fully available in the literature. We study this by casting sampling-based reachable-set recovery as geometric support estimation over a family of problems specified by an initial set, its dynamics, and a sampling law. First, we identify two regularity properties, positive reach of the initial set's complement and Lipschitz continuity of the dynamics, that together make recovery well-posed: a probability-mass coverage guarantee can be upgraded to accuracy $r$ in Hausdorff distance. Second, we bound the resulting sample complexity: recovery is achievable with $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}\big((e^{3LT}/r)^n\big)$ samples, exponential in both the state dimension and the time horizon. Third, we show that neither can be removed: an minimax lower bound of $Ω\big((e^{LT}/r)^n\big)$ holds for every estimator, so the exponential dependence on dimension and the degradation over the horizon are both intrinsic, not artifacts of a particular method. Experiments on nonlinear systems confirm that adversarial sampling improves constants but not the scaling.

Safe Control using Learned Safety Filters and Adaptive Conformal Inference

Safety filters have been shown to be effective tools to ensure the safety of control systems with unsafe nominal policies. To address scalability challenges in traditional synthesis methods, learning-based approaches have been proposed for designing safety filters for systems with high-dimensional state and control spaces. However, the inevitable errors in the decisions of these models raise concerns about their reliability and the safety guarantees they offer. This paper presents Adaptive Conformal Filtering (ACoFi), a method that combines learned Hamilton-Jacobi reachability-based safety filters with adaptive conformal inference. Under ACoFi, the filter dynamically adjusts its switching criteria based on the observed errors in its predictions of the safety of actions. The range of possible safety values of the nominal policy's output is used to quantify uncertainty in safety assessment. The filter switches from the nominal policy to the learned safe one when that range suggests it might be unsafe. We show that ACoFi guarantees that the rate of incorrectly quantifying uncertainty in the predicted safety of the nominal policy is asymptotically upper bounded by a user-defined parameter. This gives a soft safety guarantee rather than a hard safety guarantee. We evaluate ACoFi in a Dubins car simulation and a Safety Gymnasium environment, empirically demonstrating that it significantly outperforms the baseline method that uses a fixed switching threshold by achieving higher learned safety values and fewer safety violations, especially in out-of-distribution scenarios.

Statistically Assuring Safety of Control Systems using Ensembles of Safety Filters and Conformal Prediction

Safety assurance is a fundamental requirement for deploying learning-enabled autonomous systems. Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) reachability analysis is a fundamental method for formally verifying safety and generating safe controllers. However, computing the HJ value function that characterizes the backward reachable set (BRS) of a set of user-defined failure states is computationally expensive, especially for high-dimensional systems, motivating the use of reinforcement learning approaches to approximate the value function. Unfortunately, a learned value function and its corresponding safe policy are not guaranteed to be correct. The learned value function evaluated at a given state may not be equal to the actual safety return achieved by following the learned safe policy. To address this challenge, we introduce a conformal prediction-based (CP) framework that bounds such uncertainty. We leverage CP to provide probabilistic safety guarantees when using learned HJ value functions and policies to prevent control systems from reaching failure states. Specifically, we use CP to calibrate the switching between the unsafe nominal controller and the learned HJ-based safe policy and to derive safety guarantees under this switched policy. We also investigate using an ensemble of independently trained HJ value functions as a safety filter and compare this ensemble approach to using individual value functions alone.

Designing Latent Safety Filters using Pre-Trained Vision Models

Ensuring safety of vision-based control systems remains a major challenge hindering their deployment in critical settings. Safety filters have gained increased interest as effective tools for ensuring the safety of classical control systems, but their applications in vision-based control settings have so far been limited. Pre-trained vision models (PVRs) have been shown to be effective perception backbones for control in various robotics domains. In this paper, we are interested in examining their effectiveness when used for designing vision-based safety filters. We use them as backbones for classifiers defining failure sets, for Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) reachability-based safety filters, and for latent world models. We discuss the trade-offs between training from scratch, fine-tuning, and freezing the PVRs when training the models they are backbones for. We also evaluate whether one of the PVRs is superior across all tasks, evaluate whether learned world models or Q-functions are better for switching decisions to safe policies, and discuss practical considerations for deploying these PVRs on resource-constrained devices.

Learning Neural Control Barrier Functions from Offline Data with Conservatism

Safety filters, particularly those based on control barrier functions, have gained increased interest as effective tools for safe control of dynamical systems. Existing correct-by-construction synthesis algorithms, however, suffer from the curse of dimensionality. Deep learning approaches have been proposed in recent years to address this challenge. In this paper, we contribute to this line of work by proposing an algorithm for training control barrier functions from offline datasets. Our algorithm trains the filter to not only prevent the system from reaching unsafe states but also out-of-distribution ones, at which the filter would be unreliable. It is inspired by Conservative Q-learning, an offline reinforcement learning algorithm. We call its outputs Conservative Control Barrier Functions (CCBFs). Our empirical results demonstrate that CCBFs outperform existing methods in maintaining safety and out-of-distribution avoidance while minimally affecting task performance.

Learning Ensembles of Vision-based Safety Control Filters

Safety filters in control systems correct nominal controls that violate safety constraints. Designing such filters as functions of visual observations in uncertain and complex environments is challenging. Several deep learning-based approaches to tackle this challenge have been proposed recently. However, formally verifying that the learned filters satisfy critical properties that enable them to guarantee the safety of the system is currently beyond reach. Instead, in this work, motivated by the success of ensemble methods in reinforcement learning, we empirically investigate the efficacy of ensembles in enhancing the accuracy and the out-of-distribution generalization of such filters, as a step towards more reliable ones. We experiment with diverse pre-trained vision representation models as filter backbones, training approaches, and output aggregation techniques. We compare the performance of ensembles with different configurations against each other, their individual member models, and large single-model baselines in distinguishing between safe and unsafe states and controls in the DeepAccident dataset. Our results show that diverse ensembles have better state and control classification accuracies compared to individual models.