Fantastic Generalization Measures are Nowhere to be Found

Numerous generalization bounds have been proposed in the literature as potential explanations for the ability of neural networks to generalize in the overparameterized setting. However, none of these bounds are tight. For instance, in their paper ``Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find Them'', Jiang et al. (2020) examine more than a dozen generalization bounds, and show empirically that none of them imply guarantees that can explain the remarkable performance of neural networks. This raises the question of whether tight generalization bounds are at all possible. We consider two types of generalization bounds common in the literature: (1) bounds that depend on the training set and the output of the learning algorithm. There are multiple bounds of this type in the literature (e.g., norm-based and margin-based bounds), but we prove mathematically that no such bound can be uniformly tight in the overparameterized setting; (2) bounds that depend on the training set and on the learning algorithm (e.g., stability bounds). For these bounds, we show a trade-off between the algorithm's performance and the bound's tightness. Namely, if the algorithm achieves good accuracy on certain distributions in the overparameterized setting, then no generalization bound can be tight for it. We conclude that generalization bounds in the overparameterized setting cannot be tight without suitable assumptions on the population distribution.

Finite Littlestone Dimension Implies Finite Information Complexity

We prove that every online learnable class of functions of Littlestone dimension $d$ admits a learning algorithm with finite information complexity. Towards this end, we use the notion of a globally stable algorithm. Generally, the information complexity of such a globally stable algorithm is large yet finite, roughly exponential in $d$. We also show there is room for improvement; for a canonical online learnable class, indicator functions of affine subspaces of dimension $d$, the information complexity can be upper bounded logarithmically in $d$.

A Johnson--Lindenstrauss Framework for Randomly Initialized CNNs

How does the geometric representation of a dataset change after the application of each randomly initialized layer of a neural network? The celebrated Johnson--Lindenstrauss lemma answers this question for linear fully-connected neural networks (FNNs), stating that the geometry is essentially preserved. For FNNs with the ReLU activation, the angle between two inputs contracts according to a known mapping. The question for non-linear convolutional neural networks (CNNs) becomes much more intricate. To answer this question, we introduce a geometric framework. For linear CNNs, we show that the Johnson--Lindenstrauss lemma continues to hold, namely, that the angle between two inputs is preserved. For CNNs with ReLU activation, on the other hand, the behavior is richer: The angle between the outputs contracts, where the level of contraction depends on the nature of the inputs. In particular, after one layer, the geometry of natural images is essentially preserved, whereas for Gaussian correlated inputs, CNNs exhibit the same contracting behavior as FNNs with ReLU activation.

Regularization by Misclassification in ReLU Neural Networks

We study the implicit bias of ReLU neural networks trained by a variant of SGD where at each step, the label is changed with probability $p$ to a random label (label smoothing being a close variant of this procedure). Our experiments demonstrate that label noise propels the network to a sparse solution in the following sense: for a typical input, a small fraction of neurons are active, and the firing pattern of the hidden layers is sparser. In fact, for some instances, an appropriate amount of label noise does not only sparsify the network but further reduces the test error. We then turn to the theoretical analysis of such sparsification mechanisms, focusing on the extremal case of $p=1$. We show that in this case, the network withers as anticipated from experiments, but surprisingly, in different ways that depend on the learning rate and the presence of bias, with either weights vanishing or neurons ceasing to fire.

On Symmetry and Initialization for Neural Networks

This work provides an additional step in the theoretical understanding of neural networks. We consider neural networks with one hidden layer and show that when learning symmetric functions, one can choose initial conditions so that standard SGD training efficiently produces generalization guarantees. We empirically verify this and show that this does not hold when the initial conditions are chosen at random. The proof of convergence investigates the interaction between the two layers of the network. Our results highlight the importance of using symmetry in the design of neural networks.

Average-Case Information Complexity of Learning

How many bits of information are revealed by a learning algorithm for a concept class of VC-dimension $d$? Previous works have shown that even for $d=1$ the amount of information may be unbounded (tend to $\infty$ with the universe size). Can it be that all concepts in the class require leaking a large amount of information? We show that typically concepts do not require leakage. There exists a proper learning algorithm that reveals $O(d)$ bits of information for most concepts in the class. This result is a special case of a more general phenomenon we explore. If there is a low information learner when the algorithm {\em knows} the underlying distribution on inputs, then there is a learner that reveals little information on an average concept {\em without knowing} the distribution on inputs.

On the Perceptron's Compression

We study and provide exposition to several phenomena that are related to the perceptron's compression. One theme concerns modifications of the perceptron algorithm that yield better guarantees on the margin of the hyperplane it outputs. These modifications can be useful in training neural networks as well, and we demonstrate them with some experimental data. In a second theme, we deduce conclusions from the perceptron's compression in various contexts.

A Direct Sum Result for the Information Complexity of Learning

How many bits of information are required to PAC learn a class of hypotheses of VC dimension $d$? The mathematical setting we follow is that of Bassily et al. (2018), where the value of interest is the mutual information $\mathrm{I}(S;A(S))$ between the input sample $S$ and the hypothesis outputted by the learning algorithm $A$. We introduce a class of functions of VC dimension $d$ over the domain $\mathcal{X}$ with information complexity at least $\Omega\left(d\log \log \frac{|\mathcal{X}|}{d}\right)$ bits for any consistent and proper algorithm (deterministic or random). Bassily et al. proved a similar (but quantitatively weaker) result for the case $d=1$. The above result is in fact a special case of a more general phenomenon we explore. We define the notion of information complexity of a given class of functions $\mathcal{H}$. Intuitively, it is the minimum amount of information that an algorithm for $\mathcal{H}$ must retain about its input to ensure consistency and properness. We prove a direct sum result for information complexity in this context; roughly speaking, the information complexity sums when combining several classes.

Learners that Use Little Information

We study learning algorithms that are restricted to using a small amount of information from their input sample. We introduce a category of learning algorithms we term $d$-bit information learners, which are algorithms whose output conveys at most $d$ bits of information of their input. A central theme in this work is that such algorithms generalize. We focus on the learning capacity of these algorithms, and prove sample complexity bounds with tight dependencies on the confidence and error parameters. We also observe connections with well studied notions such as sample compression schemes, Occam's razor, PAC-Bayes and differential privacy. We discuss an approach that allows us to prove upper bounds on the amount of information that algorithms reveal about their inputs, and also provide a lower bound by showing a simple concept class for which every (possibly randomized) empirical risk minimizer must reveal a lot of information. On the other hand, we show that in the distribution-dependent setting every VC class has empirical risk minimizers that do not reveal a lot of information.