When One Modality Is Not Enough: Multimodal Sex and Life-Stage Classification of Red Deer from Aerial RGB-Thermal Video

Aerial drone surveys increasingly support wildlife population estimation, yet a useful census is more than a count: population dynamics are defined by species composition, sex ratios and age structure, that is, by which species are present and how a herd splits into adult males, adult females and juveniles. We use red deer ($\textit{Cervus elaphus}$) as a test case, because managers act on these dynamics and because the visible cue defining adult males, the antlers, is seasonally variable. Surveys are flown nadir, high enough not to disturb the animals, so each deer occupies only a small, low-resolution patch. The two recording modalities fail in opposite conditions: in color a deer under canopy blends into the ground, while in thermal it becomes a bright blob that loses fine detail. Rather than trust either modality alone, we fuse them at every stage using self-supervised DINOv3 features. Our pipeline tracks animals in both modalities, treats an animal as confirmed only when the two cameras agree, keeps only the clear, non-occluded frames, and assigns species and sex by a vote across them; life stage is read separately from geo-referenced body size, since at survey resolution a juvenile often only differs from an adult female in size. Across four flights spanning the antler season the fused pipeline correctly classifies 25 of the 26 detected individuals (7 of 8 adult males, all 16 adult females and 2 juveniles), against 20 of 26 for either sensor alone. Multimodal species classification reaches 96.0%, while for sex classification fusing the two sensors matters most: the combined RGB+thermal model is the most robust across environments and seasons. Automating the demographic classification turns a drone flight from a count into a repeatable reading of herd structure, so the sex ratios and age structure that managers already act on can be gathered as often as a survey can be flown.

Oh Deer, How Should I Handle This? Seasonal Priors for Selective Wildlife Annotation and Classification

Fine-grained wildlife classification in aerial imagery is limited not only by model performance, but also by unreliable labels: animals occupy few pixels, key visual cues vary seasonally, and modality-specific evidence can be ambiguous. We study adult-male identification in red deer, where the antler cycle defines predictable windows of reliable evidence for both annotation and prediction. Using 7,295 RGB-only, thermal-only, and matched RGB+thermal crop sets labeled by three annotators, we show that seasonal structure links (I) annotation quality, (II) downstream classification, and (III) selective prediction. Matched RGB+thermal review resolves more samples than either single modality, recovering majority-male labels otherwise missed by RGB or thermal alone, in human based as well as model based classification. Months with high annotator abstention also show lower classifier confidence, and soft seasonal priors mainly benefit the season-limited thermal view. Uncertainty-band abstention further improves covered accuracy up to 98.9%, though at reduced coverage and with deferral that falls disproportionately on males. Overall, a biologically grounded seasonal calendar predicts where annotation and prediction are unreliable, and can guide both annotation protocol design and modality weighting.

Vision Transformers for Zero-Shot Clustering of Animal Images: A Comparative Benchmarking Study

Manual labeling of animal images remains a significant bottleneck in ecological research, limiting the scale and efficiency of biodiversity monitoring efforts. This study investigates whether state-of-the-art Vision Transformer (ViT) foundation models can reduce thousands of unlabeled animal images directly to species-level clusters. We present a comprehensive benchmarking framework evaluating five ViT models combined with five dimensionality reduction techniques and four clustering algorithms, two supervised and two unsupervised, across 60 species (30 mammals and 30 birds), with each test using a random subset of 200 validated images per species. We investigate when clustering succeeds at species-level, where it fails, and whether clustering within the species-level reveals ecologically meaningful patterns such as sex, age, or phenotypic variation. Our results demonstrate near-perfect species-level clustering (V-measure: 0.958) using DINOv3 embeddings with t-SNE and supervised hierarchical clustering methods. Unsupervised approaches achieve competitive performance (0.943) while requiring no prior species knowledge, rejecting only 1.14% of images as outliers requiring expert review. We further demonstrate robustness to realistic long-tailed distributions of species and show that intentional over-clustering can reliably extract intra-specific variation including age classes, sexual dimorphism, and pelage differences. We introduce an open-source benchmarking toolkit and provide recommendations for ecologists to select appropriate methods for sorting their specific taxonomic groups and data.