When Agents Remember Too Much: Memory Poisoning Attacks on Large Language Model Agents

Personal AI agents powered by large language models can reason and act using available tools to access emails, manage calendars, and push code to remote repositories, all with minimal oversight. When augmented with long-term memory, an agent can recall specific details relevant to the current task, reducing the need for large context windows. Currently, long-term memory agents tend to fall into two distinct domains: conversational and action-planning agents. Personal assistant agents sit at the convergence of these two domains and handle sensitive information while interacting with untrusted information sources, creating previously unaccounted security vulnerabilities. In this work, we introduce the novel attack vector, GhostWriter, which exploits current memory subsystems in tool-using personal agents to poison their memory store. GhostWriter operates in two phases: injection, where an adversary sends a hidden attack payload to the target agent; and activation, in which the poisoned memory is retrieved. We show that GhostWriter achieves near-universal injection rates of approximately 98% and a high average activation rate of approximately 60% against state-of-the-art agents. This attack is possible due to the lack of security-focused memory governance. In response, we propose Agentic Memory Sentry (AM-Sentry), which leverages two mitigation techniques: a memory-saving policy and a memory-retrieval screen. Our experiments show that AM-Sentry dramatically reduces GhostWriter's success rate while preserving agent utility.

LATTEO: A Framework to Support Learning Asynchronously Tempered with Trusted Execution and Obfuscation

The privacy vulnerabilities of the federated learning (FL) paradigm, primarily caused by gradient leakage, have prompted the development of various defensive measures. Nonetheless, these solutions have predominantly been crafted for and assessed in the context of synchronous FL systems, with minimal focus on asynchronous FL. This gap arises in part due to the unique challenges posed by the asynchronous setting, such as the lack of coordinated updates, increased variability in client participation, and the potential for more severe privacy risks. These concerns have stymied the adoption of asynchronous FL. In this work, we first demonstrate the privacy vulnerabilities of asynchronous FL through a novel data reconstruction attack that exploits gradient updates to recover sensitive client data. To address these vulnerabilities, we propose a privacy-preserving framework that combines a gradient obfuscation mechanism with Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) for secure asynchronous FL aggregation at the network edge. To overcome the limitations of conventional enclave attestation, we introduce a novel data-centric attestation mechanism based on Multi-Authority Attribute-Based Encryption. This mechanism enables clients to implicitly verify TEE-based aggregation services, effectively handle on-demand client participation, and scale seamlessly with an increasing number of asynchronous connections. Our gradient obfuscation mechanism reduces the structural similarity index of data reconstruction by 85% and increases reconstruction error by 400%, while our framework improves attestation efficiency by lowering average latency by up to 1500% compared to RA-TLS, without additional overhead.