Alert button
Picture for Fons van der Sommen

Fons van der Sommen

Alert button

*: shared first/last authors

IndustReal: A Dataset for Procedure Step Recognition Handling Execution Errors in Egocentric Videos in an Industrial-Like Setting

Oct 26, 2023
Tim J. Schoonbeek, Tim Houben, Hans Onvlee, Peter H. N. de With, Fons van der Sommen

Viaarxiv icon

Segmentation-based Assessment of Tumor-Vessel Involvement for Surgical Resectability Prediction of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Oct 01, 2023
Christiaan Viviers, Mark Ramaekers, Amaan Valiuddin, Terese Hellström, Nick Tasios, John van der Ven, Igor Jacobs, Lotte Ewals, Joost Nederend, Peter de With, Misha Luyer, Fons van der Sommen

Figure 1 for Segmentation-based Assessment of Tumor-Vessel Involvement for Surgical Resectability Prediction of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Figure 2 for Segmentation-based Assessment of Tumor-Vessel Involvement for Surgical Resectability Prediction of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Figure 3 for Segmentation-based Assessment of Tumor-Vessel Involvement for Surgical Resectability Prediction of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Figure 4 for Segmentation-based Assessment of Tumor-Vessel Involvement for Surgical Resectability Prediction of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Viaarxiv icon

Investigating and Improving Latent Density Segmentation Models for Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Imaging

Aug 15, 2023
M. M. Amaan Valiuddin, Christiaan G. A. Viviers, Ruud J. G. van Sloun, Peter H. N. de With, Fons van der Sommen

Figure 1 for Investigating and Improving Latent Density Segmentation Models for Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Imaging
Figure 2 for Investigating and Improving Latent Density Segmentation Models for Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Imaging
Figure 3 for Investigating and Improving Latent Density Segmentation Models for Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Imaging
Figure 4 for Investigating and Improving Latent Density Segmentation Models for Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Imaging
Viaarxiv icon

A signal processing interpretation of noise-reduction convolutional neural networks

Jul 25, 2023
Luis A. Zavala-Mondragón, Peter H. N. de With, Fons van der Sommen

Figure 1 for A signal processing interpretation of noise-reduction convolutional neural networks
Figure 2 for A signal processing interpretation of noise-reduction convolutional neural networks
Figure 3 for A signal processing interpretation of noise-reduction convolutional neural networks
Figure 4 for A signal processing interpretation of noise-reduction convolutional neural networks
Viaarxiv icon

Probabilistic 3D segmentation for aleatoric uncertainty quantification in full 3D medical data

May 01, 2023
Christiaan G. A. Viviers, Amaan M. M. Valiuddin, Peter H. N. de With, Fons van der Sommen

Viaarxiv icon

Towards real-time 6D pose estimation of objects in single-view cone-beam X-ray

Nov 06, 2022
Christiaan G. A. Viviers, Joel de Bruijn, Lena Filatova, Peter H. N. de With, Fons van der Sommen

Viaarxiv icon

Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detection of Melanoma with Wavelet-based Normalizing Flows

Aug 10, 2022
M. M. Amaan Valiuddin, Christiaan G. A. Viviers, Ruud J. G. van Sloun, Peter H. N. de With, Fons van der Sommen

Figure 1 for Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detection of Melanoma with Wavelet-based Normalizing Flows
Figure 2 for Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detection of Melanoma with Wavelet-based Normalizing Flows
Figure 3 for Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detection of Melanoma with Wavelet-based Normalizing Flows
Figure 4 for Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detection of Melanoma with Wavelet-based Normalizing Flows
Viaarxiv icon

Improved Pancreatic Tumor Detection by Utilizing Clinically-Relevant Secondary Features

Aug 06, 2022
Christiaan G. A. Viviers, Mark Ramaekers, Peter H. N. de With, Dimitrios Mavroeidis, Joost Nederend, Misha Luyer, Fons van der Sommen

Figure 1 for Improved Pancreatic Tumor Detection by Utilizing Clinically-Relevant Secondary Features
Figure 2 for Improved Pancreatic Tumor Detection by Utilizing Clinically-Relevant Secondary Features
Figure 3 for Improved Pancreatic Tumor Detection by Utilizing Clinically-Relevant Secondary Features
Figure 4 for Improved Pancreatic Tumor Detection by Utilizing Clinically-Relevant Secondary Features
Viaarxiv icon

Is the winner really the best? A critical analysis of common research practice in biomedical image analysis competitions

Jun 06, 2018
Lena Maier-Hein*, Matthias Eisenmann*, Annika Reinke, Sinan Onogur, Marko Stankovic, Patrick Scholz, Tal Arbel, Hrvoje Bogunovic, Andrew P. Bradley, Aaron Carass, Carolin Feldmann, Alejandro F. Frangi, Peter M. Full, Bram van Ginneken, Allan Hanbury, Katrin Honauer, Michal Kozubek, Bennett A. Landman, Keno März, Oskar Maier, Klaus Maier-Hein, Bjoern H. Menze, Henning Müller, Peter F. Neher, Wiro Niessen, Nasir Rajpoot, Gregory C. Sharp, Korsuk Sirinukunwattana, Stefanie Speidel, Christian Stock, Danail Stoyanov, Abdel Aziz Taha, Fons van der Sommen, Ching-Wei Wang, Marc-André Weber, Guoyan Zheng, Pierre Jannin*, Annette Kopp-Schneider*

Figure 1 for Is the winner really the best? A critical analysis of common research practice in biomedical image analysis competitions
Figure 2 for Is the winner really the best? A critical analysis of common research practice in biomedical image analysis competitions
Figure 3 for Is the winner really the best? A critical analysis of common research practice in biomedical image analysis competitions
Figure 4 for Is the winner really the best? A critical analysis of common research practice in biomedical image analysis competitions
Viaarxiv icon