A transformer architecture alteration to incentivise externalised reasoning

We propose a new architectural change, and post-training pipeline, for making LLMs more verbose reasoners by teaching a model to truncate forward passes early. We augment an existing transformer architecture with an early-exit mechanism at intermediate layers and train the model to exit at shallower layers when the next token can be predicted without deep computation. After a calibration stage, we incentivise the model to exit as early as possible while maintaining task performance using reinforcement learning. We provide preliminary results to this effect for small reasoning models, showing that they learn to adaptively reduce computations across tokens. We predict that, applied at the right scale, our approach can minimise the amount of excess computation that reasoning models have at their disposal to perform non-myopic planning using their internal activations, reserving this only for difficult-to-predict tokens.

Diffusion models under low-noise regime

Recent work on diffusion models proposed that they operate in two regimes: memorization, in which models reproduce their training data, and generalization, in which they generate novel samples. While this has been tested in high-noise settings, the behavior of diffusion models as effective denoisers when the corruption level is small remains unclear. To address this gap, we systematically investigated the behavior of diffusion models under low-noise diffusion dynamics, with implications for model robustness and interpretability. Using (i) CelebA subsets of varying sample sizes and (ii) analytic Gaussian mixture benchmarks, we reveal that models trained on disjoint data diverge near the data manifold even when their high-noise outputs converge. We quantify how training set size, data geometry, and model objective choice shape denoising trajectories and affect score accuracy, providing insights into how these models actually learn representations of data distributions. This work starts to address gaps in our understanding of generative model reliability in practical applications where small perturbations are common.