Second Order Drifting Models

Drifting models are a recent class of one-step generative models that evolve the model distribution during training using a predefined sample-based drift field. Although they avoid iterative inference, their kernel-based drift fields induce frequency-dependent training dynamics: In the linearized regime, each Fourier mode of the density residual decays at a rate determined by the kernel spectrum, leading to slow recovery of fine-scale structure. We propose Second-Order Drifting Models, which lift drifting dynamics into phase space by augmenting generated samples with artificial velocity variables. We show that the resulting density perturbations obey accelerated second-order dynamics in Fourier space, connecting drifting models to the celebrated Nesterov acceleration from optimization theory. This provides a principled mechanism for mitigating the spectral stiffness of first-order drifting while preserving one-step inference. We derive a practical semi-implicit training algorithm and evaluate it on synthetic distribution matching, sequential data generation, and robotic control. Across these settings, the second-order drifting model improves convergence behavior and achieves competitive or superior performance over first-order drifting baselines.

Global Minima, Recoverability Thresholds, and Higher-Order Structure in GNNS

We analyze the performance of graph neural network (GNN) architectures from the perspective of random graph theory. Our approach promises to complement existing lenses on GNN analysis, such as combinatorial expressive power and worst-case adversarial analysis, by connecting the performance of GNNs to typical-case properties of the training data. First, we theoretically characterize the nodewise accuracy of one- and two-layer GCNs relative to the contextual stochastic block model (cSBM) and related models. We additionally prove that GCNs cannot beat linear models under certain circumstances. Second, we numerically map the recoverability thresholds, in terms of accuracy, of four diverse GNN architectures (GCN, GAT, SAGE, and Graph Transformer) under a variety of assumptions about the data. Sample results of this second analysis include: heavy-tailed degree distributions enhance GNN performance, GNNs can work well on strongly heterophilous graphs, and SAGE and Graph Transformer can perform well on arbitrarily noisy edge data, but no architecture handled sufficiently noisy feature data well. Finally, we show how both specific higher-order structures in synthetic data and the mix of empirical structures in real data have dramatic effects (usually negative) on GNN performance.