Let's (not) just put things in Context: Test-Time Training for Long-Context LLMs

Progress on training and architecture strategies has enabled LLMs with millions of tokens in context length. However, empirical evidence suggests that such long-context LLMs can consume far more text than they can reliably use. On the other hand, it has been shown that inference-time compute can be used to scale performance of LLMs, often by generating thinking tokens, on challenging tasks involving multi-step reasoning. Through controlled experiments on sandbox long-context tasks, we find that such inference-time strategies show rapidly diminishing returns and fail at long context. We attribute these failures to score dilution, a phenomenon inherent to static self-attention. Further, we show that current inference-time strategies cannot retrieve relevant long-context signals under certain conditions. We propose a simple method that, through targeted gradient updates on the given context, provably overcomes limitations of static self-attention. We find that this shift in how inference-time compute is spent leads to consistently large performance improvements across models and long-context benchmarks. Our method leads to large 12.6 and 14.1 percentage point improvements for Qwen3-4B on average across subsets of LongBench-v2 and ZeroScrolls benchmarks. The takeaway is practical: for long context, a small amount of context-specific training is a better use of inference compute than current inference-time scaling strategies like producing more thinking tokens.

Efficacy of Dual-Encoders for Extreme Multi-Label Classification

Dual-encoder models have demonstrated significant success in dense retrieval tasks for open-domain question answering that mostly involves zero-shot and few-shot scenarios. However, their performance in many-shot retrieval problems where training data is abundant, such as extreme multi-label classification (XMC), remains under-explored. Existing empirical evidence suggests that, for such problems, the dual-encoder method's accuracies lag behind the performance of state-of-the-art (SOTA) extreme classification methods that grow the number of learnable parameters linearly with the number of classes. As a result, some recent extreme classification techniques use a combination of dual-encoders and a learnable classification head for each class to excel on these tasks. In this paper, we investigate the potential of "pure" DE models in XMC tasks. Our findings reveal that when trained correctly standard dual-encoders can match or outperform SOTA extreme classification methods by up to 2% at Precision@1 even on the largest XMC datasets while being 20x smaller in terms of the number of trainable parameters. We further propose a differentiable topk error-based loss function, which can be used to specifically optimize for Recall@k metrics. We include our PyTorch implementation along with other resources for reproducing the results in the supplementary material.