Abstract:Generative retrieval (GR) has become a scalable approach to candidate generation: each item is assigned a short hierarchical token sequence called a Semantic ID (SID), and the next item's SID is decoded autoregressively. A practical limitation is that the decoder's beam search optimizes the likelihood of token sequences, not the relevance of the underlying items. These objectives diverge when sequence likelihood is poorly calibrated due to beam search error accumulation, and when several items collapse onto a single SID and receive identical scores. We introduce Gryphon, an encoder-decoder generative recommendation architecture that adds a jointly trained item-level scoring component alongside SID generation, reusing the encoder's user representation computed in a single forward pass. Instead of ranking SIDs by accumulated token likelihood, Gryphon resolves each generated SID to its concrete items and re-scores those items directly, which sidesteps miscalibrated sequence scores and separates items that collide on the same identifier. On an industrial music service, with item-level scoring trained under a next-item-prediction objective, Gryphon attains the highest item-level Recall@1000, above the strongest baselines (+3.7% over vanilla GR and +2.5% over collision-resolved GR) at comparable parameter count and latency. Gryphon's item-level ranking also surpasses its beam-likelihood ranking of the same candidates (+4.2% gain), demonstrating the benefit of item-level scoring in GR. Deployed as the sole candidate source in a 7-day A/B test, Gryphon produced no statistically significant change in total listening time (+0.25%) while replacing a pipeline of more than 15 candidate generators and a separate preranking stage, substantially simplifying the candidate-generation system.
Abstract:Since their introduction, Transformer-based models, such as SASRec and BERT4Rec, have become common baselines for sequential recommendations, surpassing earlier neural and non-neural methods. A number of following publications have shown that the effectiveness of these models can be improved by, for example, slightly updating the architecture of the Transformer layers, using better training objectives, and employing improved loss functions. However, the additivity of these modular improvements has not been systematically benchmarked - this is the gap we aim to close in this paper. Through our experiments, we identify a very strong model that uses SASRec's training objective, LiGR Transformer layers, and Sampled Softmax Loss. We call this combination eSASRec (Enhanced SASRec). While we primarily focus on realistic, production-like evaluation, in our preliminarily study we find that common academic benchmarks show eSASRec to be 23% more effective compared to the most recent state-of-the-art models, such as ActionPiece. In our main production-like benchmark, eSASRec resides on the Pareto frontier in terms of the accuracy-coverage tradeoff (alongside the recent industrial models HSTU and FuXi. As the modifications compared to the original SASRec are relatively straightforward and no extra features are needed (such as timestamps in HSTU), we believe that eSASRec can be easily integrated into existing recommendation pipelines and can can serve as a strong yet very simple baseline for emerging complicated algorithms. To facilitate this, we provide the open-source implementations for our models and benchmarks in repository https://github.com/blondered/transformer_benchmark