Multivariate Probabilistic Assessment of Speech Quality

The mean opinion score (MOS) is a standard metric for assessing speech quality, but its singular focus fails to identify specific distortions when low scores are observed. The NISQA dataset addresses this limitation by providing ratings across four additional dimensions: noisiness, coloration, discontinuity, and loudness, alongside MOS. In this paper, we extend the explored univariate MOS estimation to a multivariate framework by modeling these dimensions jointly using a multivariate Gaussian distribution. Our approach utilizes Cholesky decomposition to predict covariances without imposing restrictive assumptions and extends probabilistic affine transformations to a multivariate context. Experimental results show that our model performs on par with state-of-the-art methods in point estimation, while uniquely providing uncertainty and correlation estimates across speech quality dimensions. This enables better diagnosis of poor speech quality and informs targeted improvements.

Impairments are Clustered in Latents of Deep Neural Network-based Speech Quality Models

In this article, we provide an experimental observation: Deep neural network (DNN) based speech quality assessment (SQA) models have inherent latent representations where many types of impairments are clustered. While DNN-based SQA models are not trained for impairment classification, our experiments show good impairment classification results in an appropriate SQA latent representation. We investigate the clustering of impairments using various kinds of audio degradations that include different types of noises, waveform clipping, gain transition, pitch shift, compression, reverberation, etc. To visualize the clusters we perform classification of impairments in the SQA-latent representation domain using a standard k-nearest neighbor (kNN) classifier. We also develop a new DNN-based SQA model, named DNSMOS+, to examine whether an improvement in SQA leads to an improvement in impairment classification. The classification accuracy is 94% for LibriAugmented dataset with 16 types of impairments and 54% for ESC-50 dataset with 50 types of real noises.