AgentCAT: Simulating Computerized Adaptive Testing via Multi-Agent Large Language Models

Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT), as a key technology for personalized education, aims to accurately assess examinee proficiency by retrieving exercises dynamically matching current ability estimates. However, existing CAT research is constrained by limitations of static offline data and isolated component optimization. Restricted by partial labels in offline logs, researchers degrade the dynamic assessment process into static sequence prediction. Current research focuses on isolated perspectives, e.g., selection or diagnosis, neglecting the overall CAT interaction process. To address this, we propose AgentCAT, a Large Language Model-based multi-agent simulation system, to construct a high-fidelity benchmarking environment for dynamic testing. This framework comprises three modules: (1) The examinee agent with memory retrieval and Chain-of-Thought reasoning simulates responses based on cognitive profiles; (2) The selection agent uses coarse-to-fine bucketing and knowledge graph exploration to balance local difficulty and global coverage; (3) The supervisor uses dual-auditing and robust update to ensure convergence and validity. To validate the framework, we evaluated on two real-world datasets across three dimensions: macro-level ability convergence, micro-level interaction logic, and data sparsity resilience. Results show AgentCAT achieves effective ability estimation, and its selection strategy balances difficulty adaptation and instructional coherence, aligning with human pedagogical intuition.

Diffusion-Inspired Cold Start with Sufficient Prior in Computerized Adaptive Testing

Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) aims to select the most appropriate questions based on the examinee's ability and is widely used in online education. However, existing CAT systems often lack initial understanding of the examinee's ability, requiring random probing questions. This can lead to poorly matched questions, extending the test duration and negatively impacting the examinee's mindset, a phenomenon referred to as the Cold Start with Insufficient Prior (CSIP) task. This issue occurs because CAT systems do not effectively utilize the abundant prior information about the examinee available from other courses on online platforms. These response records, due to the commonality of cognitive states across different knowledge domains, can provide valuable prior information for the target domain. However, no prior work has explored solutions for the CSIP task. In response to this gap, we propose Diffusion Cognitive States TransfeR Framework (DCSR), a novel domain transfer framework based on Diffusion Models (DMs) to address the CSIP task. Specifically, we construct a cognitive state transition bridge between domains, guided by the common cognitive states of examinees, encouraging the model to reconstruct the initial ability state in the target domain. To enrich the expressive power of the generated data, we analyze the causal relationships in the generation process from a causal perspective. Redundant and extraneous cognitive states can lead to limited transfer and negative transfer effects. Our DCSR can seamlessly apply the generated initial ability states in the target domain to existing question selection algorithms, thus improving the cold start performance of the CAT system. Extensive experiments conducted on five real-world datasets demonstrate that DCSR significantly outperforms existing baseline methods in addressing the CSIP task.

Enhancing Cognitive Diagnosis using Un-interacted Exercises: A Collaboration-aware Mixed Sampling Approach

Cognitive diagnosis is a crucial task in computational education, aimed at evaluating students' proficiency levels across various knowledge concepts through exercises. Current models, however, primarily rely on students' answered exercises, neglecting the complex and rich information contained in un-interacted exercises. While recent research has attempted to leverage the data within un-interacted exercises linked to interacted knowledge concepts, aiming to address the long-tail issue, these studies fail to fully explore the informative, un-interacted exercises related to broader knowledge concepts. This oversight results in diminished performance when these models are applied to comprehensive datasets. In response to this gap, we present the Collaborative-aware Mixed Exercise Sampling (CMES) framework, which can effectively exploit the information present in un-interacted exercises linked to un-interacted knowledge concepts. Specifically, we introduce a novel universal sampling module where the training samples comprise not merely raw data slices, but enhanced samples generated by combining weight-enhanced attention mixture techniques. Given the necessity of real response labels in cognitive diagnosis, we also propose a ranking-based pseudo feedback module to regulate students' responses on generated exercises. The versatility of the CMES framework bolsters existing models and improves their adaptability. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness and interpretability of our framework through comprehensive experiments on real-world datasets.