Holistic Evaluation of Language Models

Language models (LMs) are becoming the foundation for almost all major language technologies, but their capabilities, limitations, and risks are not well understood. We present Holistic Evaluation of Language Models (HELM) to improve the transparency of language models. First, we taxonomize the vast space of potential scenarios (i.e. use cases) and metrics (i.e. desiderata) that are of interest for LMs. Then we select a broad subset based on coverage and feasibility, noting what's missing or underrepresented (e.g. question answering for neglected English dialects, metrics for trustworthiness). Second, we adopt a multi-metric approach: We measure 7 metrics (accuracy, calibration, robustness, fairness, bias, toxicity, and efficiency) for each of 16 core scenarios when possible (87.5% of the time). This ensures metrics beyond accuracy don't fall to the wayside, and that trade-offs are clearly exposed. We also perform 7 targeted evaluations, based on 26 targeted scenarios, to analyze specific aspects (e.g. reasoning, disinformation). Third, we conduct a large-scale evaluation of 30 prominent language models (spanning open, limited-access, and closed models) on all 42 scenarios, 21 of which were not previously used in mainstream LM evaluation. Prior to HELM, models on average were evaluated on just 17.9% of the core HELM scenarios, with some prominent models not sharing a single scenario in common. We improve this to 96.0%: now all 30 models have been densely benchmarked on the same core scenarios and metrics under standardized conditions. Our evaluation surfaces 25 top-level findings. For full transparency, we release all raw model prompts and completions publicly for further analysis, as well as a general modular toolkit. We intend for HELM to be a living benchmark for the community, continuously updated with new scenarios, metrics, and models.

FORML: Learning to Reweight Data for Fairness

Deployed machine learning models are evaluated by multiple metrics beyond accuracy, such as fairness and robustness. However, such models are typically trained to minimize the average loss for a single metric, which is typically a proxy for accuracy. Training to optimize a single metric leaves these models prone to fairness violations, especially when the population of sub-groups in the training data are imbalanced. This work addresses the challenge of jointly optimizing fairness and predictive performance in the multi-class classification setting by introducing Fairness Optimized Reweighting via Meta-Learning (FORML), a training algorithm that balances fairness constraints and accuracy by jointly optimizing training sample weights and a neural network's parameters. The approach increases fairness by learning to weight each training datum's contribution to the loss according to its impact on reducing fairness violations, balancing the contributions from both over- and under-represented sub-groups. We empirically validate FORML on a range of benchmark and real-world classification datasets and show that our approach improves equality of opportunity fairness criteria over existing state-of-the-art reweighting methods by approximately 1% on image classification tasks and by approximately 5% on a face attribute prediction task. This improvement is achieved without pre-processing data or post-processing model outputs, without learning an additional weighting function, and while maintaining accuracy on the original predictive metric.