Agents' Last Exam

Recent AI systems have achieved strong results on a wide range of benchmarks, yet these gains have not translated into economically meaningful deployment across many professional domains. We argue that this gap is largely an evaluation problem: widely used benchmarks lack sustained performance measurement on real and economically valuable workflows. This paper introduces Agents' Last Exam (ALE), a benchmark designed to evaluate AI agents on long-horizon, economically valuable, real-world tasks with verifiable outcomes. Developed in collaboration with 250+ industry experts, ALE covers non-physical industries defined with reference to O*NET / SOC 2018 (the U.S. federal occupational taxonomy). It is organized around a task taxonomy with 55 subfields grouped into 13 industry clusters covering 1K+ tasks. Current results show that the hardest tier remains far from saturated: across mainstream harness and backbone configurations, the average full pass rate is 2.6%. ALE is designed as a living benchmark: its task pool grows continuously as new workflows and industries are onboarded. More broadly, ALE is intended not merely as another leaderboard, but as an instrument for closing the gap between benchmark success and GDP-relevant impact.

Bimanual XR Specification of Relative and Absolute Assembly Hierarchies for Teleoperation

We present a bimanual XR interaction approach for specifying remote assembly tasks as hierarchies of relative and absolute object constraints that specify high-level teleoperation goals for robots. Grabbing one object in each hand creates a constraint group (visualized as a hull) and groups can be nested into hierarchies. Each group can be relative (with a robot-specifiable 6DoF pose) or absolute (with an author-specified fixed 6DoF pose) in relation to its parent. A relative group specifies a subassembly that can be constructed at a location chosen by the robot software for efficiency rather than mandated by the user.