RECTOR: Priority-Aware Rule-Based Reranking for Compliance-Aware Autonomous Driving Trajectory Selection

Autonomous driving stacks must pick one trajectory from a multi-modal candidate set; choosing by model confidence ignores safety, traffic-law, and comfort constraints. We present \textsc{RECTOR} (Rule-Enforced Constrained Trajectory Orchestrator), a post-generation reranking layer that scores candidates against a tiered rulebook (Safety~$\succ$~Legal~$\succ$~Road~$\succ$~Comfort) via differentiable proxies and a scene-conditioned applicability mechanism, then selects with a deterministic $\varepsilon$-lexicographic rule that preserves cross-tier priority by construction -- without retraining the predictor. On the Waymo Open Motion Dataset \texttt{validation\_interactive} split (43{,}219 augmented instances, $K{=}6$), under Protocol~B (28-rule proxy catalog, oracle applicability) rule-aware selection cuts Safety+Legal violations from 28.58\% to 20.42\% and Total from 40.32\% to 32.41\% versus confidence-only on the same candidates. A uniform-weight weighted-sum baseline matches binary compliance on this benchmark -- the empirical lift comes from rule-aware ranking, while the lexicographic guarantee is the structural differentiator no weight calibration can replicate. Under adversarial confidence corruption, confidence-only selection fails in 100\% of scenarios while both rule-aware selectors reject the injected mode in $\sim$96\%. All figures are proxy-evaluator results (not a safety certificate), open-loop, 5\,s horizon, U.S.\ rules, validation split.

Evaluation of Remote Driver Performance in Urban Environment Operational Design Domains

Remote driving has emerged as a solution for enabling human intervention in scenarios where Automated Driving Systems (ADS) face challenges, particularly in urban Operational Design Domains (ODDs). This study evaluates the performance of Remote Drivers (RDs) of passenger cars in a representative urban ODD in Las Vegas, focusing on the influence of cumulative driving experience and targeted training approaches. Using performance metrics such as efficiency, braking, acceleration, and steering, the study shows that driving experience can lead to noticeable improvements of RDs and demonstrates how experience up to 600 km correlates with improved vehicle control. In addition, driving efficiency exhibited a positive trend with increasing kilometers, particularly during the first 300 km of experience, which reaches a plateau from 400 km within a range of 0.35 to 0.42 km/min in the defined ODD. The research further compares ODD-specific training methods, where the detailed ODD training approaches attains notable advantages over other training approaches. The findings underscore the importance of tailored ODD training in enhancing RD performance, safety, and scalability for Remote Driving System (RDS) in real-world applications, while identifying opportunities for optimizing training protocols to address both routine and extreme scenarios. The study provides a robust foundation for advancing RDS deployment within urban environments, contributing to the development of scalable and safety-critical remote operation standards.