SynGallery: A Synthetic Gallery of Real Paintings for Instance-Level Artwork Recognition

Instance-level artwork recognition requires matching a handheld visitor photograph to a specific work in a large museum collection. This is challenging because painting datasets typically provide clean catalog images for training, while test queries are captured under oblique viewpoints, gallery lighting, reflections, frames, and other scene-level variations. We present SynGallery, a synthetic gallery dataset for artwork retrieval that addresses this gap without collecting additional real photographs. Starting from catalog images of real paintings, we place each artwork into a procedurally generated 3D gallery scene and render it from multiple viewpoints under varied geometric and appearance conditions, while preserving the exact identity of the original work. The resulting dataset contains 24,490 rendered views of 4,898 paintings from the Met benchmark. We show that these synthetic views provide a stronger training signal than the corresponding studio photographs. At the same number of training data points, training only on SynGallery improves art painting recognition from 67.18 to 73.47 GAP$^-$. When added to the full Met training set, SynGallery improves the published benchmark protocol from 35.97 to 38.48 GAP. Ablation experiments show that the gain comes primarily from geometric viewpoint variation rather than photographic realism: blur, sensor noise, and image compression consistently reduce performance.

SADGE: Structure and Appearance Domain Gap Estimation of Synthetic and Real Data

We propose SADGE, a quantitative similarity metric that predicts the performance of synthetic image datasets for common computer vision tasks without downstream model training. Estimating whether a synthetic dataset will lead to a model that performs well on real-world data remains a bottleneck in model development. Existing evaluation metrics (e.g., PSNR, FID, CLIP) primarily measure semantic alignment between real and synthetic images (Appearance Similarity Score). Less commonly, structural similarity between images is considered to assess the domain gap (Geometric Similarity Score). However, to the best of our knowledge there exists no studies that evaluate which similarity metric is the best downstream predictor for a given synthetic dataset. In this paper, we show over a wide variety of different synthetic datasets and downstream tasks that neither appearance nor geometry alone can reliably predict downstream performance; rather, it is their non-linear interplay that dictates synthetic data utility. Specifically, we measure how commonly used Appearance and Geometric Similarity metrics computed between synthetic and real images correlate with downstream performance in object detection, semantic segmentation, and pose estimation. Across five public synthetic-to-real benchmark families and 15 dataset-level variants (79k image pairs), SADGE achieves the strongest association with downstream transfer performance under both linear and rank-based criteria, reaching Pearson r=0.88 and Spearman rho=0.77. We compute for each combination of geometry-based methods and appearance-based approaches SADGE scores across all benchmark families. The best configuration is obtained by fusing DINOv3 appearance similarity with MASt3R geometric consistency through a constrained bilinear interaction, outperforming both the strongest geometry-only baseline and the strongest appearance-only baseline .

MaSC: A Masked Similarity Metric for Evaluating Concept-Driven Generation

Evaluating single-concept personalization in text-to-image diffusion requires measuring both concept preservation, which captures identity fidelity to a reference, and prompt following, which captures whether the generated scene matches the prompt. Existing metrics commonly compute these signals using global image or text-image embeddings, such as CLIP-I, DINO, and CLIP-T. We show that such metrics correlate poorly with human perception because they attend to the image as a whole instead of separating the concept subject from the background. We introduce MaSC, a masked similarity metric that uses externally provided foreground concept masks to decompose evaluation into subject-specific concept preservation and background-based prompt following. MaSC computes both scores from frozen SigLIP2 SO400M-NaFlex features: concept preservation is measured by masked max-cosine matching between foreground reference patches and generated-image patches, while prompt following is measured by comparing a background-only pooled image embedding to a subject-stripped prompt embedding. On DreamBench++ human ratings, MaSC achieves Krippendorff alpha = 0.471 for concept preservation, outperforming all tested non-LLM baselines and GPT-4V, and approaching GPT-4o. On ORIDa, a real-photo identity-preservation benchmark across physical environments, MaSC achieves AUC = 0.992, nearly perfectly distinguishing same-subject from cross-subject pairs. Its prompt-following score also outperforms the CLIP-T baseline shipped with DreamBench++. These results show that spatially decomposed aggregation is a strong design principle for evaluating concept-driven generation.