OPGAgent: An Agent for Auditable Dental Panoramic X-ray Interpretation

Orthopantomograms (OPGs) are the standard panoramic radiograph in dentistry, used for full-arch screening across multiple diagnostic tasks. While Vision Language Models (VLMs) now allow multi-task OPG analysis through natural language, they underperform task-specific models on most individual tasks. Agentic systems that orchestrate specialized tools offer a path to both versatility and accuracy, this approach remains unexplored in the field of dental imaging. To address this gap, we propose OPGAgent, a multi-tool agentic system for auditable OPG interpretation. OPGAgent coordinates specialized perception modules with a consensus mechanism through three components: (1) a Hierarchical Evidence Gathering module that decomposes OPG analysis into global, quadrant, and tooth-level phases with dynamically invoking tools, (2) a Specialized Toolbox encapsulating spatial, detection, utility, and expert zoos, and (3) a Consensus Subagent that resolves conflicts through anatomical constraints. We further propose OPG-Bench, a structured-report protocol based on (Location, Field, Value) triples derived from real clinical reports, which enables a comprehensive review of findings and hallucinations, extending beyond the limitations of VQA indicators. On our OPG-Bench and the public MMOral-OPG benchmark, OPGAgent outperforms current dental VLMs and medical agent frameworks across both structured-report and VQA evaluation. Code will be released upon acceptance.

Reproducing and Improving CheXNet: Deep Learning for Chest X-ray Disease Classification

Deep learning for radiologic image analysis is a rapidly growing field in biomedical research and is likely to become a standard practice in modern medicine. On the publicly available NIH ChestX-ray14 dataset, containing X-ray images that are classified by the presence or absence of 14 different diseases, we reproduced an algorithm known as CheXNet, as well as explored other algorithms that outperform CheXNet's baseline metrics. Model performance was primarily evaluated using the F1 score and AUC-ROC, both of which are critical metrics for imbalanced, multi-label classification tasks in medical imaging. The best model achieved an average AUC-ROC score of 0.85 and an average F1 score of 0.39 across all 14 disease classifications present in the dataset.