Human-robot collaborative transport personalization via Dynamic Movement Primitives and velocity scaling

Nowadays, industries are showing a growing interest in human-robot collaboration, particularly for shared tasks. This requires intelligent strategies to plan a robot's motions, considering both task constraints and human-specific factors such as height and movement preferences. This work introduces a novel approach to generate personalized trajectories using Dynamic Movement Primitives (DMPs), enhanced with real-time velocity scaling based on human feedback. The method was rigorously tested in industrial-grade experiments, focusing on the collaborative transport of an engine cowl lip section. Comparative analysis between DMP-generated trajectories and a state-of-the-art motion planner (BiTRRT) highlights their adaptability combined with velocity scaling. Subjective user feedback further demonstrates a clear preference for DMP- based interactions. Objective evaluations, including physiological measurements from brain and skin activity, reinforce these findings, showcasing the advantages of DMPs in enhancing human-robot interaction and improving user experience.

Modeling and analysis of pHRI with Differential Game Theory

Applications involving humans and robots working together are spreading nowadays. Alongside, modeling and control techniques that allow physical Human-Robot Interaction (pHRI) are widely investigated. To better understand its potential application in pHRI, this work investigates the Cooperative Differential Game Theory modeling of pHRI in a cooperative reaching task, specifically for reference tracking. The proposed controller based on Collaborative Game Theory is deeply analyzed and compared in simulations with two other techniques, Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) and Non-Cooperative Game-Theoretic Controller. The set of simulations shows how different tuning of control parameters affects the system response and control efforts of both the players for the three controllers, suggesting the use of Cooperative GT in the case the robot should assist the human, while Non-Cooperative GT represents a better choice in the case the robot should lead the action. Finally, preliminary tests with a trained human are performed to extract useful information on the real applicability and limitations of the proposed method.