Conventional approaches to grasp planning require perfect knowledge of an object's pose and geometry. Uncertainties in these quantities induce uncertainties in the quality of planned grasps, which can lead to failure. Classically, grasp robustness refers to the ability to resist external disturbances after grasping an object. In contrast, this work studies robustness to intrinsic sources of uncertainty like object pose or geometry affecting grasp planning before execution. To do so, we develop a novel analytic theory of grasping that reasons about this intrinsic robustness by characterizing the effect of friction cone uncertainty on a grasp's force closure status. As a result, we show the Ferrari-Canny metric -- which measures the size of external disturbances a grasp can reject -- bounds the friction cone uncertainty a grasp can tolerate, and thus also measures intrinsic robustness. In tandem, we show that the recently proposed min-weight metric lower bounds the Ferrari-Canny metric, justifying it as a computationally-efficient, uncertainty-aware alternative. We validate this theory on hardware experiments versus a competitive baseline and demonstrate superior performance. Finally, we use our theory to develop an analytic notion of probabilistic force closure, which we show in simulation generates grasps that can incorporate uncertainty distributions over an object's geometry.