Meta-learning enables rapid generalization to new tasks by learning meta-knowledge from a variety of tasks. It is intuitively assumed that the more tasks a model learns in one training batch, the richer knowledge it acquires, leading to better generalization performance. However, contrary to this intuition, our experiments reveal an unexpected result: adding more tasks within a single batch actually degrades the generalization performance. To explain this unexpected phenomenon, we conduct a Structural Causal Model (SCM) for causal analysis. Our investigation uncovers the presence of spurious correlations between task-specific causal factors and labels in meta-learning. Furthermore, the confounding factors differ across different batches. We refer to these confounding factors as ``Task Confounders". Based on this insight, we propose a plug-and-play Meta-learning Causal Representation Learner (MetaCRL) to eliminate task confounders. It encodes decoupled causal factors from multiple tasks and utilizes an invariant-based bi-level optimization mechanism to ensure their causality for meta-learning. Extensive experiments on various benchmark datasets demonstrate that our work achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance.