There is an imminent need for guidelines and standard test sets to allow direct and fair comparisons of speech emotion recognition (SER). While resources, such as the Interactive Emotional Dyadic Motion Capture (IEMOCAP) database, have emerged as widely-adopted reference corpora for researchers to develop and test models for SER, published work reveals a wide range of assumptions and variety in its use that challenge reproducibility and generalization. Based on a critical review of the latest advances in SER using IEMOCAP as the use case, our work aims at two contributions: First, using an analysis of the recent literature, including assumptions made and metrics used therein, we provide a set of SER evaluation guidelines. Second, using recent publications with open-sourced implementations, we focus on reproducibility assessment in SER.