Data poisoning considers cases when an adversary maliciously inserts and removes training data to manipulate the behavior of machine learning algorithms. Traditional threat models of data poisoning center around a single metric, the number of poisoned samples. In consequence, existing defenses are essentially vulnerable in practice when poisoning more samples remains a feasible option for attackers. To address this issue, we leverage timestamps denoting the birth dates of data, which are often available but neglected in the past. Benefiting from these timestamps, we propose a temporal threat model of data poisoning and derive two novel metrics, earliness and duration, which respectively measure how long an attack started in advance and how long an attack lasted. With these metrics, we define the notions of temporal robustness against data poisoning, providing a meaningful sense of protection even with unbounded amounts of poisoned samples. We present a benchmark with an evaluation protocol simulating continuous data collection and periodic deployments of updated models, thus enabling empirical evaluation of temporal robustness. Lastly, we develop and also empirically verify a baseline defense, namely temporal aggregation, offering provable temporal robustness and highlighting the potential of our temporal modeling of data poisoning.