An oft-cited challenge of federated learning is the presence of data heterogeneity -- the data at different clients may follow very different distributions. Several federated optimization methods have been proposed to address these challenges. In the literature, empirical evaluations usually start federated training from a random initialization. However, in many practical applications of federated learning, the server has access to proxy data for the training task which can be used to pre-train a model before starting federated training. We empirically study the impact of starting from a pre-trained model in federated learning using four common federated learning benchmark datasets. Unsurprisingly, starting from a pre-trained model reduces the training time required to reach a target error rate and enables training more accurate models (by up to 40\%) than is possible than when starting from a random initialization. Surprisingly, we also find that the effect of data heterogeneity is much less significant when starting federated training from a pre-trained initialization. Rather, when starting from a pre-trained model, using an adaptive optimizer at the server, such as \textsc{FedAdam}, consistently leads to the best accuracy. We recommend that future work proposing and evaluating federated optimization methods consider the performance when starting both random and pre-trained initializations. We also believe this study raises several questions for further work on understanding the role of heterogeneity in federated optimization.