Policy optimization is a fundamental principle for designing reinforcement learning algorithms, and one example is the proximal policy optimization algorithm with a clipped surrogate objective (PPO-clip), which has been popularly used in deep reinforcement learning due to its simplicity and effectiveness. Despite its superior empirical performance, PPO-clip has not been justified via theoretical proof up to date. This paper proposes to rethink policy optimization and reinterpret the theory of PPO-clip based on hinge policy optimization (HPO), called to improve policy by hinge loss in this paper. Specifically, we first identify sufficient conditions of state-wise policy improvement and then rethink policy update as solving a large-margin classification problem with hinge loss. By leveraging various types of classifiers, the proposed design opens up a whole new family of policy-based algorithms, including the PPO-clip as a special case. Based on this construct, we prove that these algorithms asymptotically attain a globally optimal policy. To our knowledge, this is the first ever that can prove global convergence to an optimal policy for a variant of PPO-clip. We corroborate the performance of a variety of HPO algorithms through experiments and an ablation study.