Both generic and domain-specific BERT models are widely used for natural language processing (NLP) tasks. In this paper we investigate the vulnerability of BERT models to variation in input data for Named Entity Recognition (NER) through adversarial attack. Experimental results show that the original as well as the domain-specific BERT models are highly vulnerable to entity replacement: They can be fooled in 89.2 to 99.4% of the cases to mislabel previously correct entities. BERT models are also vulnerable to variation in the entity context with 20.2 to 45.0% of entities predicted completely wrong and another 29.3 to 53.3% of entities predicted wrong partially. Often a single change is sufficient to fool the model. BERT models seem most vulnerable to changes in the local context of entities. Of the two domain-specific BERT models, the vulnerability of BioBERT is comparable to the original BERT model whereas SciBERT is even more vulnerable. Our results chart the vulnerabilities of BERT models for NER and emphasize the importance of further research into uncovering and reducing these weaknesses.