Alert button

Best-Arm Identification in Correlated Multi-Armed Bandits

Sep 10, 2021
Samarth Gupta, Gauri Joshi, Osman Yağan

Figure 1 for Best-Arm Identification in Correlated Multi-Armed Bandits
Figure 2 for Best-Arm Identification in Correlated Multi-Armed Bandits
Figure 3 for Best-Arm Identification in Correlated Multi-Armed Bandits
Figure 4 for Best-Arm Identification in Correlated Multi-Armed Bandits

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it:

In this paper we consider the problem of best-arm identification in multi-armed bandits in the fixed confidence setting, where the goal is to identify, with probability $1-\delta$ for some $\delta>0$, the arm with the highest mean reward in minimum possible samples from the set of arms $\mathcal{K}$. Most existing best-arm identification algorithms and analyses operate under the assumption that the rewards corresponding to different arms are independent of each other. We propose a novel correlated bandit framework that captures domain knowledge about correlation between arms in the form of upper bounds on expected conditional reward of an arm, given a reward realization from another arm. Our proposed algorithm C-LUCB, which generalizes the LUCB algorithm utilizes this partial knowledge of correlations to sharply reduce the sample complexity of best-arm identification. More interestingly, we show that the total samples obtained by C-LUCB are of the form $\mathcal{O}\left(\sum_{k \in \mathcal{C}} \log\left(\frac{1}{\delta}\right)\right)$ as opposed to the typical $\mathcal{O}\left(\sum_{k \in \mathcal{K}} \log\left(\frac{1}{\delta}\right)\right)$ samples required in the independent reward setting. The improvement comes, as the $\mathcal{O}(\log(1/\delta))$ term is summed only for the set of competitive arms $\mathcal{C}$, which is a subset of the original set of arms $\mathcal{K}$. The size of the set $\mathcal{C}$, depending on the problem setting, can be as small as $2$, and hence using C-LUCB in the correlated bandits setting can lead to significant performance improvements. Our theoretical findings are supported by experiments on the Movielens and Goodreads recommendation datasets.

* IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory (Volume: 2, Issue: 2, June 2021)  
View paper onarxiv icon

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it: