Alert button

DeSePtion: Dual Sequence Prediction and Adversarial Examples for Improved Fact-Checking

Apr 27, 2020
Christopher Hidey, Tuhin Chakrabarty, Tariq Alhindi, Siddharth Varia, Kriste Krstovski, Mona Diab, Smaranda Muresan

Figure 1 for DeSePtion: Dual Sequence Prediction and Adversarial Examples for Improved Fact-Checking
Figure 2 for DeSePtion: Dual Sequence Prediction and Adversarial Examples for Improved Fact-Checking
Figure 3 for DeSePtion: Dual Sequence Prediction and Adversarial Examples for Improved Fact-Checking
Figure 4 for DeSePtion: Dual Sequence Prediction and Adversarial Examples for Improved Fact-Checking

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it:

The increased focus on misinformation has spurred development of data and systems for detecting the veracity of a claim as well as retrieving authoritative evidence. The Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER) dataset provides such a resource for evaluating end-to-end fact-checking, requiring retrieval of evidence from Wikipedia to validate a veracity prediction. We show that current systems for FEVER are vulnerable to three categories of realistic challenges for fact-checking -- multiple propositions, temporal reasoning, and ambiguity and lexical variation -- and introduce a resource with these types of claims. Then we present a system designed to be resilient to these "attacks" using multiple pointer networks for document selection and jointly modeling a sequence of evidence sentences and veracity relation predictions. We find that in handling these attacks we obtain state-of-the-art results on FEVER, largely due to improved evidence retrieval.

* ACL 2020  
View paper onarxiv icon

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it: