Get our free extension to see links to code for papers anywhere online!

Chrome logo Add to Chrome

Firefox logo Add to Firefox


Deep Learning versus Classical Regression for Brain Tumor Patient Survival Prediction

Nov 12, 2018
Yannick Suter, Alain Jungo, Michael Rebsamen, Urspeter Knecht, Evelyn Herrmann, Roland Wiest, Mauricio Reyes


Share this with someone who'll enjoy it:


Deep learning for regression tasks on medical imaging data has shown promising results. However, compared to other approaches, their power is strongly linked to the dataset size. In this study, we evaluate 3D-convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and classical regression methods with hand-crafted features for survival time regression of patients with high grade brain tumors. The tested CNNs for regression showed promising but unstable results. The best performing deep learning approach reached an accuracy of 51.5% on held-out samples of the training set. All tested deep learning experiments were outperformed by a Support Vector Classifier (SVC) using 30 radiomic features. The investigated features included intensity, shape, location and deep features. The submitted method to the BraTS 2018 survival prediction challenge is an ensemble of SVCs, which reached a cross-validated accuracy of 72.2% on the BraTS 2018 training set, 57.1% on the validation set, and 42.9% on the testing set. The results suggest that more training data is necessary for a stable performance of a CNN model for direct regression from magnetic resonance images, and that non-imaging clinical patient information is crucial along with imaging information.

* Contribution to The International Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2018, survival prediction task 


   Access Paper Source



Share this with someone who'll enjoy it: