In this paper, we introduce a new WordNet based similarity metric, SenSim, which incorporates sentiment content (i.e., degree of positive or negative sentiment) of the words being compared to measure the similarity between them. The proposed metric is based on the hypothesis that knowing the sentiment is beneficial in measuring the similarity. To verify this hypothesis, we measure and compare the annotator agreement for 2 annotation strategies: 1) sentiment information of a pair of words is considered while annotating and 2) sentiment information of a pair of words is not considered while annotating. Inter-annotator correlation scores show that the agreement is better when the two annotators consider sentiment information while assigning a similarity score to a pair of words. We use this hypothesis to measure the similarity between a pair of words. Specifically, we represent each word as a vector containing sentiment scores of all the content words in the WordNet gloss of the sense of that word. These sentiment scores are derived from a sentiment lexicon. We then measure the cosine similarity between the two vectors. We perform both intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation of SenSim and compare the performance with other widely usedWordNet similarity metrics.