A Reference-Free Framework for Evaluating Single-Frame ISP Pipelines

Evaluating camera image signal processing (ISP) pipelines requires measuring low-level artifacts introduced by operations such as denoising, demosaicing, tone mapping, and compression. Blind image quality assessment (IQA) techniques can grade visual quality without a reference, but they typically focus on semantic and high-level visual cues or human perceptual scores rather than the low-level image-processing artifacts introduced by camera pipelines. In contrast, full-reference metrics such as PSNR and SSIM measure pixel-level differences and structural similarity, while LPIPS measures perceptual similarity in deep feature space. However, these metrics require perfectly aligned image pairs, which are difficult to collect in practical settings. We propose a reference-free learning framework that estimates full-reference image quality metrics from a processed sRGB image and its ISO metadata. Our method predicts a proxy sRGB reference, which is then compared with the processed image to compute PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS in their standard full-reference form. Our experiments show that the proxy-reference model can be learned from synthetic data and applied to real camera data. We further show that lightweight LoRA fine-tuning enables efficient adaptation when ISP components or pipeline configurations are changed. The proposed method outperforms direct metric regression in estimating metric values and achieves higher agreement with full-reference rankings than conventional blind IQA methods. These results demonstrate the feasibility of reference-free estimation of full-reference metrics for practical camera-pipeline evaluation.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Interactive Language Therapy Based on LLM for High-Functioning Autistic Adolescent Psychological Counseling

This study investigates the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) in interactive language therapy for high-functioning autistic adolescents. With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, particularly in natural language processing, LLMs present a novel opportunity to augment traditional psychological counseling methods. This research primarily focuses on evaluating the LLM's ability to engage in empathetic, adaptable, and contextually appropriate interactions within a therapeutic setting. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted by a panel of clinical psychologists and psychiatrists using a specially developed scorecard. The assessment covered various aspects of the LLM's performance, including empathy, communication skills, adaptability, engagement, and the ability to establish a therapeutic alliance. The study avoided direct testing with patients, prioritizing privacy and ethical considerations, and instead relied on simulated scenarios to gauge the LLM's effectiveness. The results indicate that LLMs hold significant promise as supportive tools in therapy, demonstrating strengths in empathetic engagement and adaptability in conversation. However, challenges in achieving the depth of personalization and emotional understanding characteristic of human therapists were noted. The study also highlights the importance of ethical considerations in the application of AI in therapeutic contexts. This research provides valuable insights into the potential and limitations of using LLMs in psychological counseling for autistic adolescents. It lays the groundwork for future explorations into AI's role in mental health care, emphasizing the need for ongoing development to enhance the capabilities of these models in therapeutic settings.