Geometric Deviation as an Unsupervised Pre-Generation Reliability Signal: Probing LLM Representations for Answerability

A reliable language model should be able to signal, prior to generation, when a query falls outside its knowledge. We investigate whether representation geometry can provide such a pre-generation signal by measuring the deviation of hidden states from an answerable reference set, requiring no labeled failure data and no access to model outputs. Across three instruction-tuned models (Llama 3.1-8B, Qwen 2.5-7B, and Mistral-7B-Instruct) and three prompt forms (Math, Fact, Code), we find that geometry primarily encodes task form. Within mathematical prompts, unanswerable inputs consistently deviate from the answerable centroid, yielding strong separation (ROC-AUC 0.78-0.84). This single-pass pre-generation signal outperforms a simple refusal baseline and compares favorably to self-consistency. It also captures cases where models do not explicitly refuse. In contrast, no reliable geometric signal emerges for factual prompts, indicating that the effect is form-conditional rather than universal. Code prompts show large effect sizes with higher variance, suggesting partial generalization beyond mathematical form. A layer-wise analysis reveals that the signal arises in early layers and gradually attenuates toward the output. These results suggest that answerability-related geometry is established before the final stages of generation. Together, these findings indicate that geometric deviation can serve as a lightweight pre-generation signal that is reliable in structured domains with formal answerability constraints, with clear boundaries on where it generalizes.

$T^2$ of Thoughts: Temperature Tree Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools in artificial intelligence, especially in complex decision-making scenarios, but their static problem-solving strategies often limit their adaptability to dynamic environments. We explore the enhancement of reasoning capabilities in LLMs through Temperature Tree ($T^2$) prompting via Particle Swarm Optimization, termed as $T^2$ of Thoughts ($T^2oT$). The primary focus is on enhancing decision-making processes by dynamically adjusting search parameters, especially temperature, to improve accuracy without increasing computational demands. We empirically validate that our hybrid $T^2oT$ approach yields enhancements in, single-solution accuracy, multi-solution generation and text generation quality. Our findings suggest that while dynamic search depth adjustments based on temperature can yield mixed results, a fixed search depth, when coupled with adaptive capabilities of $T^2oT$, provides a more reliable and versatile problem-solving strategy. This work highlights the potential for future explorations in optimizing algorithmic interactions with foundational language models, particularly illustrated by our development for the Game of 24 and Creative Writing tasks.