Widest-Path Reachability Fields for Connectivity-Preserving Slender Structure Segmentation

Segmenting slender curvilinear structures such as retinal vessels, cracks, and roads demands topological correctness, as even a single-pixel discontinuity can fragment a continuous network and invalidate downstream analysis. Under standard binary-mask supervision, models optimized for pixel-level overlap frequently produce topologically broken predictions. We trace this to a fundamental mismatch: pixel-wise losses distribute gradients uniformly, yet connectivity hinges on a sparse set of bottleneck pixels. These pixels are vastly outnumbered by thick structures and background, rendering their aggregate gradient contribution negligible. We term this phenomenon topological gradient starvation (TGS). To address it, we propose Widest-Path Reachability Fields (WPRF), a differentiable Max-Min reachability objective that redirects gradient flow to connectivity bottlenecks. The module is plug-and-play, backbone-agnostic, and incurs no inference overhead. WPRF implements a differentiable Max-Min objective via dynamic programming on a domain-restricted graph, coupled with a bottleneck-aware observation term that balances gradient contributions across varying structures. Compared to prior topology-aware losses that rely on post-hoc skeletonization or homology computation, WPRF directly optimizes end-to-end reachability via differentiable Max-Min algebra, enabling gradient flow to concentrate on connectivity bottlenecks without auxiliary structures. We introduce OMVIS, a new oral microvessel segmentation dataset. Experiments across nine architectures and six datasets validate the bottleneck-focused gradient routing mechanism. WPRF improves 87\% of experiments with fixed hyperparameters and achieves clDice gains of 7.2 percentage points on structurally fragile datasets.

Open-Ended Scenario Reasoning for Specialist Model Adaptation

Process industries have accumulated validated specialist models, yet sensor drift, feedstock variation, and regime switching cause these models to degrade systematically in new scenarios. Collecting new labeled data and retraining is costly, while continuing with the original model incurs persistent bias. Existing adaptation methods require modifying model parameters with sufficient labeled data, making rapid response on deployed systems difficult. Using LLMs as direct predictors risks hallucinations and uncontrollable outputs. Such predictors also cannot incorporate unstructured scenario knowledge from the field. To address these limitations, this article proposes Reasoning-Driven Open Adaptation for Specialist Models (ROAM), a framework that uses LLM world knowledge and reasoning to adapt frozen specialist models to unseen scenarios without retraining. ROAM confines all corrections to a low-dimensional, semantically interpretable latent space. LLM-generated scenario judgments and online observations are fused under a unified probabilistic framework. A risk-constrained mechanism suppresses corrections under unreliable LLM evidence or abrupt scenario shifts and falls back to the original frozen model when evidence is insufficient. Experiments on a mineral thickening process and the public IndPenSim penicillin fermentation dataset show that ROAM reduces MAE by over 20\% in major shift settings such as hidden shifts with only 839 additional parameters and under 0.02\,ms per-step overhead. These results indicate that LLM reasoning can be turned into a conservative adaptation signal for industrial models already in service.

LLM-Guided Task-Semantic Field Factorization for Industrial Process Forecasting

Process industries rely on time-series forecasting and soft sensing to estimate quality variables that are hard to measure online. Labeled data are scarce, operating regimes change frequently, and retraining models or rebuilding alignment pipelines for each scenario is costly. Such settings often provide variable tables and process documents that record variable names, units, physical meanings, and process roles. However, standard time-series backbones usually treat inputs as anonymous numerical columns. Existing text-enhanced methods also rarely make the semantic-logical relations between input variables and the prediction target available to the model within each numerical window. To address this problem, this article proposes Task-Semantic Field Factorization (TSF), a large language model (LLM)-guided framework. TSF builds a task-semantic field from task protocols and variable documents before training and uses the LLM only for offline semantic construction. Online training and inference remain with conventional time-series backbones. During training and inference, the current numerical window activates variable semantics, so semantic information participates in each prediction and supports adaptation to different prediction targets and operating shifts. On multiple complex industrial forecasting and soft-sensing tasks, TSF reduces MAE by 6.4\% on average in improved settings, with the largest reduction reaching 25.5\%. It adds only about 1.8--3.0k parameters, with less than 0.008 ms/step of additional online inference overhead. These results show that TSF turns existing process documents into measurable forecasting gains across backbones and semantic generators while remaining lightweight for deployment.

LLM-Guided Measurement Credibility Correction for Trustworthy Industrial Process Inference

Industrial prediction and soft sensing depend on credible input measurements. In field deployment, a predictor may receive biased, delayed, stale, or derived measurements that still look plausible. Prediction can then fail before the forecasting backbone becomes the main limitation, because the input window no longer represents the real process. Sensor reconstruction, data reconciliation, and fault-tolerant soft sensing reduce this risk, but they often rely on numerical correlation, alarms, fault labels, or explicit process equations. These assumptions are not always available. A correlated variable can also be an unsafe reference when variables share instruments, derived formulas, soft-sensing chains, or control actions. The key issue is to decide before prediction which external measurements can credibly support the current measurement. To address this issue, this article proposes LLM-Guided Measurement Credibility Correction (MCC). MCC converts measurement meanings in process documents into measurement semantics usable by numerical models. It builds independent process references from semantically qualified external measurements and corrects local measurement conflicts before prediction. The predictor therefore receives a more credible input window. Across multiple complex industrial forecasting and soft-sensing tasks, +MCC achieves average relative MAE reductions of 30.7% on real-test protocols and 80.3% on controlled-corruption protocols. It adds only 0.5--2.0k online parameters, with the slowest +MCC inference time at 0.089 ms/step. These results show that measurement semantics can turn process documents into lightweight pre-inference credibility correction and improve prediction accuracy.