Synthetic Melanoma Image Generation and Evaluation Using Generative Adversarial Networks

Melanoma is the most lethal form of skin cancer, and early detection is critical for improving patient outcomes. Although dermoscopy combined with deep learning has advanced automated skin-lesion analysis, progress is hindered by limited access to large, well-annotated datasets and by severe class imbalance, where melanoma images are substantially underrepresented. To address these challenges, we present the first systematic benchmarking study comparing four GAN architectures-DCGAN, StyleGAN2, and two StyleGAN3 variants (T/R)-for high-resolution melanoma-specific synthesis. We train and optimize all models on two expert-annotated benchmarks (ISIC 2018 and ISIC 2020) under unified preprocessing and hyperparameter exploration, with particular attention to R1 regularization tuning. Image quality is assessed through a multi-faceted protocol combining distribution-level metrics (FID), sample-level representativeness (FMD), qualitative dermoscopic inspection, downstream classification with a frozen EfficientNet-based melanoma detector, and independent evaluation by two board-certified dermatologists. StyleGAN2 achieves the best balance of quantitative performance and perceptual quality, attaining FID scores of 24.8 (ISIC 2018) and 7.96 (ISIC 2020) at gamma=0.8. The frozen classifier recognizes 83% of StyleGAN2-generated images as melanoma, while dermatologists distinguish synthetic from real images at only 66.5% accuracy (chance = 50%), with low inter-rater agreement (kappa = 0.17). In a controlled augmentation experiment, adding synthetic melanoma images to address class imbalance improved melanoma detection AUC from 0.925 to 0.945 on a held-out real-image test set. These findings demonstrate that StyleGAN2-generated melanoma images preserve diagnostically relevant features and can provide a measurable benefit for mitigating class imbalance in melanoma-focused machine learning pipelines.

Benchmarking and Enhancing PPG-Based Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation Methods

Cuffless blood pressure screening based on easily acquired photoplethysmography (PPG) signals offers a practical pathway toward scalable cardiovascular health assessment. Despite rapid progress, existing PPG-based blood pressure estimation models have not consistently achieved the established clinical numerical limits such as AAMI/ISO 81060-2, and prior evaluations often lack the rigorous experimental controls necessary for valid clinical assessment. Moreover, the publicly available datasets commonly used are heterogeneous and lack physiologically controlled conditions for fair benchmarking. To enable fair benchmarking under physiologically controlled conditions, we created a standardized benchmarking subset NBPDB comprising 101,453 high-quality PPG segments from 1,103 healthy adults, derived from MIMIC-III and VitalDB. Using this dataset, we systematically benchmarked several state-of-the-art PPG-based models. The results showed that none of the evaluated models met the AAMI/ISO 81060-2 accuracy requirements (mean error $<$ 5 mmHg and standard deviation $<$ 8 mmHg). To improve model accuracy, we modified these models and added patient demographic data such as age, sex, and body mass index as additional inputs. Our modifications consistently improved performance across all models. In particular, the MInception model reduced error by 23\% after adding the demographic data and yielded mean absolute errors of 4.75 mmHg (SBP) and 2.90 mmHg (DBP), achieves accuracy comparable to the numerical limits defined by AAMI/ISO accuracy standards. Our results show that existing PPG-based BP estimation models lack clinical practicality under standardized conditions, while incorporating demographic information markedly improves their accuracy and physiological validity.

NeuroMoE: A Transformer-Based Mixture-of-Experts Framework for Multi-Modal Neurological Disorder Classification

The integration of multi-modal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and clinical data holds great promise for enhancing the diagnosis of neurological disorders (NDs) in real-world clinical settings. Deep Learning (DL) has recently emerged as a powerful tool for extracting meaningful patterns from medical data to aid in diagnosis. However, existing DL approaches struggle to effectively leverage multi-modal MRI and clinical data, leading to suboptimal performance. To address this challenge, we utilize a unique, proprietary multi-modal clinical dataset curated for ND research. Based on this dataset, we propose a novel transformer-based Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework for ND classification, leveraging multiple MRI modalities-anatomical (aMRI), Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), and functional (fMRI)-alongside clinical assessments. Our framework employs transformer encoders to capture spatial relationships within volumetric MRI data while utilizing modality-specific experts for targeted feature extraction. A gating mechanism with adaptive fusion dynamically integrates expert outputs, ensuring optimal predictive performance. Comprehensive experiments and comparisons with multiple baselines demonstrate that our multi-modal approach significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy, particularly in distinguishing overlapping disease states. Our framework achieves a validation accuracy of 82.47\%, outperforming baseline methods by over 10\%, highlighting its potential to improve ND diagnosis by applying multi-modal learning to real-world clinical data.