Linguistically Informed Graph Model and Semantic Contrastive Learning for Korean Short Text Classification

Short text classification (STC) remains a challenging task due to the scarcity of contextual information and labeled data. However, existing approaches have pre-dominantly focused on English because most benchmark datasets for the STC are primarily available in English. Consequently, existing methods seldom incorporate the linguistic and structural characteristics of Korean, such as its agglutinative morphology and flexible word order. To address these limitations, we propose LIGRAM, a hierarchical heterogeneous graph model for Korean short-text classification. The proposed model constructs sub-graphs at the morpheme, part-of-speech, and named-entity levels and hierarchically integrates them to compensate for the limited contextual information in short texts while precisely capturing the grammatical and semantic dependencies inherent in Korean. In addition, we apply Semantics-aware Contrastive Learning (SemCon) to reflect semantic similarity across documents, enabling the model to establish clearer decision boundaries even in short texts where class distinctions are often ambiguous. We evaluate LIGRAM on four Korean short-text datasets, where it consistently outperforms existing baseline models. These outcomes validate that integrating language-specific graph representations with SemCon provides an effective solution for short text classification in agglutinative languages such as Korean.

Problems With Large Language Models for Learner Modelling: Why LLMs Alone Fall Short for Responsible Tutoring in K--12 Education

The rapid rise of large language model (LLM)-based tutors in K--12 education has fostered a misconception that generative models can replace traditional learner modelling for adaptive instruction. This is especially problematic in K--12 settings, which the EU AI Act classifies as high-risk domain requiring responsible design. Motivated by these concerns, this study synthesises evidence on limitations of LLM-based tutors and empirically investigates one critical issue: the accuracy, reliability, and temporal coherence of assessing learners' evolving knowledge over time. We compare a deep knowledge tracing (DKT) model with a widely used LLM, evaluated zero-shot and fine-tuned, using a large open-access dataset. Results show that DKT achieves the highest discrimination performance (AUC = 0.83) on next-step correctness prediction and consistently outperforms the LLM across settings. Although fine-tuning improves the LLM's AUC by approximately 8\% over the zero-shot baseline, it remains 6\% below DKT and produces higher early-sequence errors, where incorrect predictions are most harmful for adaptive support. Temporal analyses further reveal that DKT maintains stable, directionally correct mastery updates, whereas LLM variants exhibit substantial temporal weaknesses, including inconsistent and wrong-direction updates. These limitations persist despite the fine-tuned LLM requiring nearly 198 hours of high-compute training, far exceeding the computational demands of DKT. Our qualitative analysis of multi-skill mastery estimation further shows that, even after fine-tuning, the LLM produced inconsistent mastery trajectories, while DKT maintained smooth and coherent updates. Overall, the findings suggest that LLMs alone are unlikely to match the effectiveness of established intelligent tutoring systems, and that responsible tutoring requires hybrid frameworks that incorporate learner modelling.

Towards responsible AI for education: Hybrid human-AI to confront the Elephant in the room

Despite significant advancements in AI-driven educational systems and ongoing calls for responsible AI for education, several critical issues remain unresolved -- acting as the elephant in the room within AI in education, learning analytics, educational data mining, learning sciences, and educational psychology communities. This critical analysis identifies and examines nine persistent challenges that continue to undermine the fairness, transparency, and effectiveness of current AI methods and applications in education. These include: (1) the lack of clarity around what AI for education truly means -- often ignoring the distinct purposes, strengths, and limitations of different AI families -- and the trend of equating it with domain-agnostic, company-driven large language models; (2) the widespread neglect of essential learning processes such as motivation, emotion, and (meta)cognition in AI-driven learner modelling and their contextual nature; (3) limited integration of domain knowledge and lack of stakeholder involvement in AI design and development; (4) continued use of non-sequential machine learning models on temporal educational data; (5) misuse of non-sequential metrics to evaluate sequential models; (6) use of unreliable explainable AI methods to provide explanations for black-box models; (7) ignoring ethical guidelines in addressing data inconsistencies during model training; (8) use of mainstream AI methods for pattern discovery and learning analytics without systematic benchmarking; and (9) overemphasis on global prescriptions while overlooking localised, student-specific recommendations. Supported by theoretical and empirical research, we demonstrate how hybrid AI methods -- specifically neural-symbolic AI -- can address the elephant in the room and serve as the foundation for responsible, trustworthy AI systems in education.

Towards Responsible and Trustworthy Educational Data Mining: Comparing Symbolic, Sub-Symbolic, and Neural-Symbolic AI Methods

Given the demand for responsible and trustworthy AI for education, this study evaluates symbolic, sub-symbolic, and neural-symbolic AI (NSAI) in terms of generalizability and interpretability. Our extensive experiments on balanced and imbalanced self-regulated learning datasets of Estonian primary school students predicting 7th-grade mathematics national test performance showed that symbolic and sub-symbolic methods performed well on balanced data but struggled to identify low performers in imbalanced datasets. Interestingly, symbolic and sub-symbolic methods emphasized different factors in their decision-making: symbolic approaches primarily relied on cognitive and motivational factors, while sub-symbolic methods focused more on cognitive aspects, learned knowledge, and the demographic variable of gender -- yet both largely overlooked metacognitive factors. The NSAI method, on the other hand, showed advantages by: (i) being more generalizable across both classes -- even in imbalanced datasets -- as its symbolic knowledge component compensated for the underrepresented class; and (ii) relying on a more integrated set of factors in its decision-making, including motivation, (meta)cognition, and learned knowledge, thus offering a comprehensive and theoretically grounded interpretability framework. These contrasting findings highlight the need for a holistic comparison of AI methods before drawing conclusions based solely on predictive performance. They also underscore the potential of hybrid, human-centered NSAI methods to address the limitations of other AI families and move us closer to responsible AI for education. Specifically, by enabling stakeholders to contribute to AI design, NSAI aligns learned patterns with theoretical constructs, incorporates factors like motivation and metacognition, and strengthens the trustworthiness and responsibility of educational data mining.

Augmenting deep neural networks with symbolic knowledge: Towards trustworthy and interpretable AI for education

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have shown to be amongst the most important artificial intelligence (AI) techniques in educational applications, providing adaptive educational services. However, their educational potential is limited in practice due to three major challenges: i) difficulty in incorporating symbolic educational knowledge (e.g., causal relationships, and practitioners' knowledge) in their development, ii) learning and reflecting biases, and iii) lack of interpretability. Given the high-risk nature of education, the integration of educational knowledge into ANNs becomes crucial for developing AI applications that adhere to essential educational restrictions, and provide interpretability over the predictions. This research argues that the neural-symbolic family of AI has the potential to address the named challenges. To this end, it adapts a neural-symbolic AI framework and accordingly develops an approach called NSAI, that injects and extracts educational knowledge into and from deep neural networks, for modelling learners computational thinking. Our findings reveal that the NSAI approach has better generalizability compared to deep neural networks trained merely on training data, as well as training data augmented by SMOTE and autoencoder methods. More importantly, unlike the other models, the NSAI approach prioritises robust representations that capture causal relationships between input features and output labels, ensuring safety in learning to avoid spurious correlations and control biases in training data. Furthermore, the NSAI approach enables the extraction of rules from the learned network, facilitating interpretation and reasoning about the path to predictions, as well as refining the initial educational knowledge. These findings imply that neural-symbolic AI can overcome the limitations of ANNs in education, enabling trustworthy and interpretable applications.