Scratched Lenses, Shifted Depth: Passive Camera-Side Optical Attacks

Physical adversarial attacks on vision systems are typically studied through scene manipulation, such as adversarial patches or projections, where the adversary controls what the camera observes. Camera-side attacks using stickers or auxiliary optics have also been explored, but they treat attacks as image-space perturbations from designed patterns. This misses how physical imperfections interact with scene-dependent lighting and optics. We identify a threat: passive lens-side damage that is persistent yet trigger-conditioned, producing optical artifacts that bias geometric inference under particular visual conditions. We instantiate this threat through Scratch-induced Lens Adversarial Streak Hijacking SLASH, a physical-world attack caused by small scratches on a camera lens or protective cover. Scratches interact with bright light sources and specular reflections to create structured streak artifacts that distort depth cues. Since the perturbation is fixed in the optical path but triggered by the scene, it is both persistent and selective. We formulate the attack in optical space, model the scratch pattern as a trigger-conditioned optical channel, and optimize one fixed configuration across diverse viewing conditions. We evaluate SLASH on monocular depth estimation and monocular 3D object detection in digital and real-world settings. Under the fixed-scratch constraint, directional depth shifts reach up to 32% relative error for monocular depth estimation, with consistent effects on monocular 3D object detection. Physical experiments confirm transfer to real camera recordings, inducing depth shifts above the model's natural prediction baseline. These findings reveal an attack surface where benign-looking hardware imperfections act as latent, scene-triggered adversarial mechanisms, challenging assumptions about physical robustness and motivating defenses for secure vision systems.

AdvScene: Rethinking Adversarial Patch Evaluation Through Scene Robustness

Adversarial patches are physical patterns attached to real objects to mislead AI vision systems. Their real-world risk is not determined by a single successful prediction, but by whether they remain effective after deployment under changing viewpoints, distances, and scene conditions. We refer to this property as scene robustness, the effectiveness of a deployed patch across conditions in a real environment. Yet existing evaluations do not measure scene robustness well: real image benchmarks are realistic but fixed, while simulators are controllable but not grounded in a specific real scene. We present AdvScene, a scene-grounded framework for measuring the scene robustness of adversarial patches in reconstructed real environments. AdvScene reframes evaluation as operational measurement: given a fixed deployed patch, it characterizes the patch's operational envelope - where and when the attack succeeds - as a function of viewpoint, distance, and scene context. A key challenge is that the attack is typically defined only in a single anchor view, while evaluation requires a representation that remains faithful under viewpoint changes. We formalize this as a constrained lifting problem and introduce Adversarial Patch-to-Scene Embedding (APSE), which resolves cross-view ambiguity while preserving attack-critical appearance and enforcing locality, target-surface attachment, and cross-view consistency. We validate AdvScene using real-world physical data and conduct a comprehensive evaluation of existing adversarial patches. Our results show that AdvScene reveals substantial scene-dependent variation in attack effectiveness that is not captured by existing image-centric or simulator-based evaluations.