Three Tokens Force Exponential Feature Rank in Nonnegative Kernel Attention

Full attention exposes every token pair, whereas kernel attention compresses a sequence into a fixed-dimensional sketch. We show that this distinction becomes exponential at the first context length containing two competing candidates. On Min-IP over Boolean inputs, rank-one normalized kernel attention solves every sequence of length at most two exactly. In contrast, any single normalized nonnegative kernel-attention head that succeeds on all three-token sequences with error strictly below $1/2$ requires $2^{Ω(m)}$ features, even with arbitrary finite-dimensional tokenwise values and an arbitrary query-dependent affine readout. Dense softmax solves the same task with $m$-dimensional scores and constant temperature. The conclusion survives position-dependent token maps and a causal final query. As context length grows, the lower bound approaches the exact $2^m$-feature realization. Separately, for deterministic multihead, multilayer sketch models whose cross-token channels have finite alphabets, we prove a transcript lower bound linear in the number of independent answers and logarithmic in their alphabet size.

Indexing: the Beginning and the End

We study information bottlenecks in modern deep-learning architectures -- RNNs, softmax transformers, linear-attention transformers and state-space models -- through the lens of the indexing primitive. In this primitive, the input consists of $n$ bits and one integer $i$ from $1$ to $n$ called the index, and the output equals the value of the $i$-th bit. We introduce causal complexity for masked architectures. We show that architectures with low causal complexity cannot solve the indexing primitive in any constant number of layers when the index appears at the end of the input. In particular, this limitation applies to low-parameter RNNs, SSMs and masked linear-attention transformers. In contrast, small softmax transformers can solve it in one layer, while non-masked linear-attention transformers can solve it in 2, which separates them from their masked counterparts. In turn, when the index appears at the beginning, we show that small RNNs are capable of solving this task in 1 layer, while all the other architectures require 2. All our impossibility results are unconditional and apply even to models that employ infinite-precision real arithmetic. Moreover, experiments for up to $n=64$ qualitatively align with our theory: configurations with low-parameter theoretical solutions learn the indexing task easily, while configurations that do not admit such theoretical solutions struggle to learn as the sequence length grows.

Polynomial-Time Mistake-Bounded Language Generation

In this note, we introduce a polynomial-time version of the mistake-bounded language generation (MBLG) framework due to Kleinberg, Peale, and Reingold (2026). We observe that the family of parities of variables, and the family of conjunctions of literals, are polynomial-time MBLG. Our main result states that the family of monotone Boolean functions with polynomially-many maxterms is polynomial-time MBLG. This family includes all monotone Boolean functions, computable by polynomial-size decision trees. Our technique can be presented as a new combinatorial game about writing numbers on a board.